A Study on the Construction of Collaborative Leadership Indicators for Elementary School Principals

• Main Authors: Lu, Chia-Hua, 呂佳樺
• Other Authors: Wu, Ching-Shan
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2018
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/986mvb

碩士 === 臺北市立大學 === 教育行政與評鑑研究所 === 106 === 　　The purpose of study is to construct the principal　collaborative leadership indicators for elementary school and understand the consensus degree among those indicators. After reviewing the literatures, the questionnaire” “Construction of Principal Collaborative Leadership Indicators for elementary School “was developed, and 20 scholars were invited to be fuzzy Delphi experts to understand their opinions for this study. The indicators were designed and completed through double triangle fuzzy technique. According to the findings, main conclusions are as follows: 1.The indicators of principal collaborative leadership for elementary school consist of 5 dimensions, 27 indicators. 2.The 5 dimensions of the principal collaborative leadership indicators for elementary school include “ collaborative environment”, “ shared vision ”, “ communication and trust” , “ power sharing ”and “ conflict and risk management ”. The importance of” conflict and risk management” dimension is the highest. 3.There are 5 indicators in “collaborative environment” dimension, the importance of “Principals can lead their colleagues to achieve the educational goal.” is highest. 4.There are 6 indicators in “shared vision” dimension, the importance of” Principals can discuss with their colleagues, and set strategies to achieve tasks of school. ” is the highest. 5.There are 5 indicators in “communication and trust” dimension, the importance of “Principals can understand the members' personality, capability, and their style of handling things of the organization, and use different type of way to communicate.” is highest. 6.There are 5 indicators in “power sharing” dimension, the importance of “Principals can measure the colleagues' capability to give them approver right to rule.” is highest. 7.There are 6 indicators in “conflict and risk management” dimension, the importance of “Principals can set response strategy to lower the facing risk of the organization.” is highest. 　　Finally, based on the results, the researcher provides some suggestions for educational administrative authorities, elementary school principals and future research.