The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant

碩士 === 國立雲林科技大學 === 環境與安全衛生工程系 === 106 === In the present society, the petrochemical industry occupies an important position. However, once a disaster occurs in a petrochemical plant, apart from causing equipment damage and casualties, serious cases will further affect the ecology and residents in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Kun-Hsien, 陳昆賢
Other Authors: Shu, Chi-Min
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/tbg732
id ndltd-TW-106YUNT0633025
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-106YUNT06330252019-05-16T00:37:29Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/tbg732 The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant 比較 HAZOP 與 LOPA 評估方法於石化廠氫氣壓縮機風險的差異 Chen, Kun-Hsien 陳昆賢 碩士 國立雲林科技大學 環境與安全衛生工程系 106 In the present society, the petrochemical industry occupies an important position. However, once a disaster occurs in a petrochemical plant, apart from causing equipment damage and casualties, serious cases will further affect the ecology and residents in the surrounding areas, Therefore, it is a very important link in the prevention and control of a factory. Through various risk assessment tools to evaluate the potential hazards in the operation of the plant, we can understand the probability and severity of the risks and propose corresponding improvements. And Prevention and control, reduce the degree of disaster. HAZOP is currently a high–impact assessment tool, is a major risk assessment method for major corporations. By using the HAZOP evaluation tool, the nodes in the assessment tool are deviated from the guide word, parameters, deviation matrix analysis, risk assessment matrix, Sex, seriousness to get the risk level, but the risk assessment results only risk level, can not effectively quantify the danger. Another analytical tool, the LOPA–Protection Layer Analysis, is based on the IEC61511–3 LOPA Form to get the maximum allowable semi–quantitative risk and the risk to be neglected. LOPA assessment direction can be more detailed risk–time ratio, the rate of personnel exposure, the probability of ignition frequency correction coefficient calculation, through the independent protective layer and the incidence of intermediate events were reduced risk, which in turn safety instrumented functional integrity level (SIL) for the most important basis. In this study, hydrogen compressor was chosen for risk assessment, mainly due to hydrogen compressor accidents in many petrochemical plants in recent years. Most of the factories only conducted import–export HAZOP evaluations on compressors. The study, by combining HAZOP with LOPA, explains why a hydrogen compressor accident can occur in a petrochemical plant that has already undergone risk assessment, and then discusses the pros and cons of HAZOP and LOPA. Shu, Chi-Min 徐啟銘 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 62 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立雲林科技大學 === 環境與安全衛生工程系 === 106 === In the present society, the petrochemical industry occupies an important position. However, once a disaster occurs in a petrochemical plant, apart from causing equipment damage and casualties, serious cases will further affect the ecology and residents in the surrounding areas, Therefore, it is a very important link in the prevention and control of a factory. Through various risk assessment tools to evaluate the potential hazards in the operation of the plant, we can understand the probability and severity of the risks and propose corresponding improvements. And Prevention and control, reduce the degree of disaster. HAZOP is currently a high–impact assessment tool, is a major risk assessment method for major corporations. By using the HAZOP evaluation tool, the nodes in the assessment tool are deviated from the guide word, parameters, deviation matrix analysis, risk assessment matrix, Sex, seriousness to get the risk level, but the risk assessment results only risk level, can not effectively quantify the danger. Another analytical tool, the LOPA–Protection Layer Analysis, is based on the IEC61511–3 LOPA Form to get the maximum allowable semi–quantitative risk and the risk to be neglected. LOPA assessment direction can be more detailed risk–time ratio, the rate of personnel exposure, the probability of ignition frequency correction coefficient calculation, through the independent protective layer and the incidence of intermediate events were reduced risk, which in turn safety instrumented functional integrity level (SIL) for the most important basis. In this study, hydrogen compressor was chosen for risk assessment, mainly due to hydrogen compressor accidents in many petrochemical plants in recent years. Most of the factories only conducted import–export HAZOP evaluations on compressors. The study, by combining HAZOP with LOPA, explains why a hydrogen compressor accident can occur in a petrochemical plant that has already undergone risk assessment, and then discusses the pros and cons of HAZOP and LOPA.
author2 Shu, Chi-Min
author_facet Shu, Chi-Min
Chen, Kun-Hsien
陳昆賢
author Chen, Kun-Hsien
陳昆賢
spellingShingle Chen, Kun-Hsien
陳昆賢
The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant
author_sort Chen, Kun-Hsien
title The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant
title_short The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant
title_full The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant
title_fullStr The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant
title_full_unstemmed The differences in risk assessment between HAZOP and LOPA methods: Loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant
title_sort differences in risk assessment between hazop and lopa methods: loss prevention for the hydrogen compressor operated in a petrochemical plant
publishDate 2018
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/tbg732
work_keys_str_mv AT chenkunhsien thedifferencesinriskassessmentbetweenhazopandlopamethodslosspreventionforthehydrogencompressoroperatedinapetrochemicalplant
AT chénkūnxián thedifferencesinriskassessmentbetweenhazopandlopamethodslosspreventionforthehydrogencompressoroperatedinapetrochemicalplant
AT chenkunhsien bǐjiàohazopyǔlopapínggūfāngfǎyúshíhuàchǎngqīngqìyāsuōjīfēngxiǎndechàyì
AT chénkūnxián bǐjiàohazopyǔlopapínggūfāngfǎyúshíhuàchǎngqīngqìyāsuōjīfēngxiǎndechàyì
AT chenkunhsien differencesinriskassessmentbetweenhazopandlopamethodslosspreventionforthehydrogencompressoroperatedinapetrochemicalplant
AT chénkūnxián differencesinriskassessmentbetweenhazopandlopamethodslosspreventionforthehydrogencompressoroperatedinapetrochemicalplant
_version_ 1719169675495997440