A study of the community’s collective memory concerning the space and time lapse of urbanization of Shezidao District in Taipei

碩士 === 華梵大學 === 建築系在職專班 === 107 === How did the lake, Shazhou Island, Shezi Island, and Seiko Island come? This question is the difference between the different ages and residents of Seiko Island (including the author), and the differences in time, space and memory. How did Seiko Island come from? R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen,Hung-Yun, 陳鴻筠
Other Authors: Yeh,Nai-Chi
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/jh5b8y
Description
Summary:碩士 === 華梵大學 === 建築系在職專班 === 107 === How did the lake, Shazhou Island, Shezi Island, and Seiko Island come? This question is the difference between the different ages and residents of Seiko Island (including the author), and the differences in time, space and memory. How did Seiko Island come from? Rise to study the development of the regional development of the Seiko Island. From the spatial change of Shazhou Island in the historical map, to explore the natural relationship between hydrology and land, the settlement development of Han and the people, and the role of natural disasters and reclamation behaviors, the names disappeared from the map, and they are mutually restrained. compromise. Continue to understand the land use thinking, the change of building materials structure and the special local beliefs that the residents have faced in the face of irregular natural disasters. The flood control plan and urban planning in Taipei after the recovery are forced. The process of entering Shazi Island into Seiko Island. From the thinking of flood control planning, urban planning, and residents, we can see the process of spatial division and alienation caused by policy intervention, which further leads to differences in the living patterns and development of the island residents, forming different historical divisions under the same time axis. However, the invasion of capital has caused the spatial structure of the Seiko Island to be completely disintegrated as the development case progresses, further moving towards the urban homogenization space. From prosperity to policy deprivation, the policies over the years have caused serious damage and deprivation of the lives and property of the residents of the Seiko Island. The ensuing development case is to erase the settlement texture on the Seiko Island. Therefore, through participation, organization and action, Rethinking the urban planning, disaster prevention and the future development possibilities of the Seiko Island, and the process of mediating with the city, established a dialogue space between Taipei City and Seiko Island.