| Summary: | 碩士 === 康寧大學 === 休閒管理研究所 === 107 === The purpose of the research was to investigate the leisure participation, leisure constraints, and leisure demands of the students with moving functional limitation in compulsory education in Tainan district. The research added the common students to be the control group to find out the difference between the students with moving functional limitation and the common students. Questionnaire investigation was adopted in this research. Author took the students in junior high school and the fourth, fifth and sixth grades in elementary school students with moving functional limitation and the common students as sample, 201 of 228 sent questionnaires returned and 196 questionnaires were valid. The data were analyzed with statistical methods like independent sample t test, single factor variance analysis, Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple regression analysis.
The research result showed that the students with moving functional limitation were obviously less participation in leisure than the common students in compulsory education in Tainan district. The highest participation in leisure of the students with moving functional limitation was “hobby entertainment”; the lowest was “sports”. The highest participation of the common student was also “hobby entertainment” and the lowest was “outdoor recreation”. Different “ parenting pattern”, “pocket money”, “degree of obstacle”, “condition of use of auxiliary” affected the leisure participation of the students with moving functional limitation. “stage of education” affected the common students’ leisure participation. The two groups showed significant differences in the background factors “male”, “education stage”, “majesty and laissez-faire family parenting” and “less pocket money”.
Leisure constraints of the students with moving functional limitation were greater than the common students. The biggest constraint was “personal intrinsic constraints ". The biggest constraint of the common students was “structural constraints”. Different “stage of education”, “degree of obstacle”, and “condition of use of auxiliary” affected the leisure constraints of the students with moving functional limitation. There is no background factor affected the common students in leisure constraints. The two groups showed significant differences in the background factors “female”, “the stage of elementary education”, “democratic and majesty family parenting” and “less pocket money”.
The highest score for leisure demands for the students with moving functional limitation was "interpersonal support". “stage of education”, “pocket money”, “degree of obstacle”, and “condition of use of auxiliary” affected the leisure demands of the students with moving functional limitation. The leisure participation, leisure constraints, and leisure demands of the students with moving functional limitation were related. The leisure constraints had significant predictive power over the leisure demands.
Finally, author offered some suggestions for parents, teachers, schools, and education authorities to provide more supports and opportunities for the students with moving functional limitation.
|
|---|
