| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 環境工程學系所 === 107 === Improve domestic air quality to reduce air pollutant emissions in public and private places, the Environmental Protection Administration of Taiwan has Announcement Correction to the fixed pollution source air pollution fee charging rate,imposing granular pollutants air pollution fees for fixed pollution sources other than construction projects. Particle pollutants Air Pollution Fee are affected by industry processes, pollution source, connection point, emission factor and control equipment. In this study, analysis of pollution discharge, Air Pollution Fee, control equipment cost and control efficiency of gravel processing industry in Nantou County, evaluate control equipment costs and Air Pollution Control Fee reduction benefits, as a reference for the selection of related industry defense equipment and academic research.
The results of this study, the main source of pollution for earth and stone processing industry is stacking area, approximately 98% of total emissions, in terms of control measures, the cost-benefit best is sprinkling measures, construction cost 14.47 TWD/m3, Maintenance and operating costs 0.8 TWD/ m3, in each quarter Air Pollution Control Fee can be deducted by101.93 TWD/m3, based on the assessment, it takes 12.6 days to even the cost and the imposed air pollution fee. Regarding the cost for reducing per unit pollutants using sprinkling measures, windshield and closed building the cost benefit increases with the operating time, however the operating cost of using spray chemical stabilizer and dust screen coverage measuredust is much more than the imposed air pollution fee, under normal circumstances, the cost and the air pollution fee cannot be evened.
Also discovered during the research, at present the air pollution fee system gravel processing industry dust screen is too low, control equipment does not affect emissions, losing economic incentives. Operating conditions for particulate pollutant Control Equipment are not subject to laws and regulations. Therefore, an explicit regulation should be legislated in the future in order to maintain control efficiency.
|
|---|
