Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study

碩士 === 國立臺東大學 === 體育學系碩士班 === 106 === The purpose of this study was to understand the training and teaching of college judo instructor, and further more to have an in-depth study in judo instructor’s thoughts before and after every curriculum training and teaching. The particpant of study was an ins...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Ching Wu, 吳宇晴
Other Authors: Yuh-Chih Chen
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/aed8q7
id ndltd-TW-107NTTU5567006
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-107NTTU55670062019-09-26T03:28:09Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/aed8q7 Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study 大學績優運動教練訓練與教學行為個案研究 Yu-Ching Wu 吳宇晴 碩士 國立臺東大學 體育學系碩士班 106 The purpose of this study was to understand the training and teaching of college judo instructor, and further more to have an in-depth study in judo instructor’s thoughts before and after every curriculum training and teaching. The particpant of study was an instructor who teach judo major training course and general course of self-defense in university. The study collected course observation and interview statistics of judo major training and general course of self-defense for 12 times of 24 lessons in 6 weeks. Systematic observation method adapted Arizona State University Observation Instrument (ASUOI), collecting quantitative data information by guided interviews and stimulating recall interviews. The study found that: (1) instructor training behavior was mainly based on monitoring (21.54%), to give instructions (19.87%) and physical assistance (12.88%), but also had little urges (1.36%), praise (1.73%) and blaming ( 1.80%). Training conduct was mostly give instructions (19.33%), physical assistance (12.38%) and directly demonstration (11.11%), by contrast those cannot be encode (2%), blamed (2.03%) and negative demonstration (2.53%) instructions were minimal. (2) Before different courses, instructor set clear but differ goals and achieves each goal in variety ways. To achieve instruction objective, the self-defense course is basically based on curriculum guidelines, but the major training course was be adjusted according to individual situation of every student. During the course, instructor modified teaching method for next time through students’ respond. Conclusion: Even different courses, the coach regarded giving instructions and physical assistance as his main method. On the contrary, the management and supervision among different courses were vastly different. The supervision of Training courses is obviously more than Teaching course. Besides, the directly demonstrations and management of Teaching courses are more than Training courses. Yuh-Chih Chen 陳玉枝 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 153 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺東大學 === 體育學系碩士班 === 106 === The purpose of this study was to understand the training and teaching of college judo instructor, and further more to have an in-depth study in judo instructor’s thoughts before and after every curriculum training and teaching. The particpant of study was an instructor who teach judo major training course and general course of self-defense in university. The study collected course observation and interview statistics of judo major training and general course of self-defense for 12 times of 24 lessons in 6 weeks. Systematic observation method adapted Arizona State University Observation Instrument (ASUOI), collecting quantitative data information by guided interviews and stimulating recall interviews. The study found that: (1) instructor training behavior was mainly based on monitoring (21.54%), to give instructions (19.87%) and physical assistance (12.88%), but also had little urges (1.36%), praise (1.73%) and blaming ( 1.80%). Training conduct was mostly give instructions (19.33%), physical assistance (12.38%) and directly demonstration (11.11%), by contrast those cannot be encode (2%), blamed (2.03%) and negative demonstration (2.53%) instructions were minimal. (2) Before different courses, instructor set clear but differ goals and achieves each goal in variety ways. To achieve instruction objective, the self-defense course is basically based on curriculum guidelines, but the major training course was be adjusted according to individual situation of every student. During the course, instructor modified teaching method for next time through students’ respond. Conclusion: Even different courses, the coach regarded giving instructions and physical assistance as his main method. On the contrary, the management and supervision among different courses were vastly different. The supervision of Training courses is obviously more than Teaching course. Besides, the directly demonstrations and management of Teaching courses are more than Training courses.
author2 Yuh-Chih Chen
author_facet Yuh-Chih Chen
Yu-Ching Wu
吳宇晴
author Yu-Ching Wu
吳宇晴
spellingShingle Yu-Ching Wu
吳宇晴
Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study
author_sort Yu-Ching Wu
title Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study
title_short Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study
title_full Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study
title_fullStr Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study
title_full_unstemmed Training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: A case study
title_sort training and teaching behavior of the elite college coach: a case study
publishDate 2018
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/aed8q7
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchingwu trainingandteachingbehavioroftheelitecollegecoachacasestudy
AT wúyǔqíng trainingandteachingbehavioroftheelitecollegecoachacasestudy
AT yuchingwu dàxuéjīyōuyùndòngjiàoliànxùnliànyǔjiàoxuéxíngwèigèànyánjiū
AT wúyǔqíng dàxuéjīyōuyùndòngjiàoliànxùnliànyǔjiàoxuéxíngwèigèànyánjiū
_version_ 1719257900261572608