Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 財務金融學研究所 === 107 === Many existing studies have investigated the relationships between different kinds of institutional investors and the corporate governance mechanisms and credit risk. While this study aims to examine the effects of different types of institutional investors on c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia-Yu Kuo, 郭家瑀
Other Authors: 廖咸興
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/q3fb4z
id ndltd-TW-107NTU05304037
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-107NTU053040372019-11-21T05:34:27Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/q3fb4z Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread 不同類型機構投資人持股對公司債殖利率利差影響 Chia-Yu Kuo 郭家瑀 碩士 國立臺灣大學 財務金融學研究所 107 Many existing studies have investigated the relationships between different kinds of institutional investors and the corporate governance mechanisms and credit risk. While this study aims to examine the effects of different types of institutional investors on corporate bond yield spreads. Since only few studies explore the effect of institutional investor on the corporate bond yield spreads when the institutional investor have multiple characteristics according to different institutional investor classifications, this study also addresses this issue. The empirical results show that different types of institutional investors have different effects on the corporate bond yield spreads. Dedicated institutional investors have no significant effect on the spreads while Transient institutional investor has a significant positive effect. In addition, both Growth style institutional investor and Value style institutional investor have a negative effect on the spreads. Especially, the effect of Growth style institutional investors is stronger. For the institutional investors with multiple identities, the empirical results show that if an institutional investor is classified as Dedicated and Growth style, it has no significant effect on bond yield spreads. However, institutional investors classified as Dedicated and Value style have a significant negative effect on bond yield spreads. In addition, if institutional investors classified as Transient and Growth style have no significant effect on bond yield spreads, while institutional investors classified as Transient and Value style have a significant positive effect on bond yield spreads. The empirical results above show that institutional investors with different combinations of investor identities have different effects on bond yield spreads. 廖咸興 2019 學位論文 ; thesis 41 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 財務金融學研究所 === 107 === Many existing studies have investigated the relationships between different kinds of institutional investors and the corporate governance mechanisms and credit risk. While this study aims to examine the effects of different types of institutional investors on corporate bond yield spreads. Since only few studies explore the effect of institutional investor on the corporate bond yield spreads when the institutional investor have multiple characteristics according to different institutional investor classifications, this study also addresses this issue. The empirical results show that different types of institutional investors have different effects on the corporate bond yield spreads. Dedicated institutional investors have no significant effect on the spreads while Transient institutional investor has a significant positive effect. In addition, both Growth style institutional investor and Value style institutional investor have a negative effect on the spreads. Especially, the effect of Growth style institutional investors is stronger. For the institutional investors with multiple identities, the empirical results show that if an institutional investor is classified as Dedicated and Growth style, it has no significant effect on bond yield spreads. However, institutional investors classified as Dedicated and Value style have a significant negative effect on bond yield spreads. In addition, if institutional investors classified as Transient and Growth style have no significant effect on bond yield spreads, while institutional investors classified as Transient and Value style have a significant positive effect on bond yield spreads. The empirical results above show that institutional investors with different combinations of investor identities have different effects on bond yield spreads.
author2 廖咸興
author_facet 廖咸興
Chia-Yu Kuo
郭家瑀
author Chia-Yu Kuo
郭家瑀
spellingShingle Chia-Yu Kuo
郭家瑀
Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread
author_sort Chia-Yu Kuo
title Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread
title_short Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread
title_full Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread
title_fullStr Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread
title_full_unstemmed Institutional Investors and Corporate Bond Yield Spread
title_sort institutional investors and corporate bond yield spread
publishDate 2019
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/q3fb4z
work_keys_str_mv AT chiayukuo institutionalinvestorsandcorporatebondyieldspread
AT guōjiāyǔ institutionalinvestorsandcorporatebondyieldspread
AT chiayukuo bùtónglèixíngjīgòutóuzīrénchígǔduìgōngsīzhàizhílìlǜlìchàyǐngxiǎng
AT guōjiāyǔ bùtónglèixíngjīgòutóuzīrénchígǔduìgōngsīzhàizhílìlǜlìchàyǐngxiǎng
_version_ 1719294423787896832