| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺南藝術大學 === 建築藝術研究所 === 107 === Object outside of the plan
The light is attached to the plane of the land at the beginning of the building, and the object disappears as the object collapses until it again covers the origin.
Chronic architecture/architecture is just an accidental under chronic disintegration
The essence of the building is built with flat inertia, but after all, it cannot extend to the boundary where the light spreads. The building cannot exist after leaving, and the departure cannot exist before the building. The architectural signs exist in the gap between the two. Whoever has entered the building may no longer be able to leave. In such an order, time is not exhausted, so in the eternal existence time, as the object gradually shatters or is pushed into the whole, it I have already left the final retreat of the building. When I left, I followed the path and re-covered it. What has already become obvious, and gradually replaced it with a blank space. From the inside to the inside seems to be the intersection where the building should exist.Under the building, our body and vision are in the path of artificial, all of which are already expected. People and paths are like the level in the mirror. There is always an angle that cannot be filled in the real world. We can never enter, and the end of the path is the origin of our body. From the inside to the outside, we can describe a kind of appearance. For the outside of space, we may have defined our existence in a broad sense, but not outside the building. Covering the exterior of all images, perhaps the outside is only in the picture, and the word outside is defined only as the inner boundary, and the contact with the inside constitutes the boundary, which extends the building. At the beginning, where is the definition in the space that is not absolutely closed is always vague, often appears at the moment after the destruction, and the definition inside is accompanied by the external passive presentation.
|
|---|
