| Summary: | 碩士 === 僑光科技大學 === 國際貿易運籌研究所 === 100 === The study applies two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and BCG Matrix to measure the efficiency of Taiwanese and mainland Chinese Banks. The conclusion as follow: (1) In terms of the operational efficiency, China Development Financing Holdings (CDFH) performed better in Taiwan and Bank of Beijing performed better in Mainland China; in profit efficiency, CDFH and Cosmos Bank performed better in Taiwan and Bank of Ningbo performed better in Mainland China; in tradition efficiency, CDFH showed better performance in Taiwan and Bank of Beijing performed better in Mainland China.(2)The profit efficiency and the tradition efficiency of the banks in mainland China were better than those in Taiwan, while the operation efficiency of the banks in Taiwan were better. (3) BCG matrix, the non-state-owned banks and the small asset size of bank both in mainland China and Taiwan are in the “Star” status, the big asset size of banks both in mainland China and Taiwan are in the “Slow down” status,the banks in mainland China are in the “cash cow” status, the state-own banks both in mainland China and Taiwan and the banks in Taiwan are in the “Problem” status.(4) The advantages and weaknesses of the different stages of each bank could be observed more clearly if the two-stage data envelopment analysis is used to evaluate the operational efficiency of the banks.
|
|---|
