Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children

This study investigated the effect of bilingualism on children's performance on two tasks of inhibition. English monolinguals (n =21) and successive Chinese-English bilinguals (n =21) in Grade 2 (ages 7-8) completed the Simon task and a picture-word Stroop task. Both tasks required the inhibiti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Campbell, Kristina J.
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/31552
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-31552
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-315522018-01-05T17:46:09Z Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children Campbell, Kristina J. This study investigated the effect of bilingualism on children's performance on two tasks of inhibition. English monolinguals (n =21) and successive Chinese-English bilinguals (n =21) in Grade 2 (ages 7-8) completed the Simon task and a picture-word Stroop task. Both tasks required the inhibition of perceptual attributes of the stimuli; certain conditions of the picture-word Stroop task also required inhibition of conceptual information. In the Simon task, children were required to ignore salient spatial cues and respond only to stimulus colour. As expected, both the monolingual and bilingual groups in this study showed faster RTs on the condition that did not involve a spatial conflict than the one that involved a spatial conflict. In contrast with previous research findings, however, a bilingual group advantage was not observed on this task. In the picture-word Stroop task, children had to name pictures with or without incongruent words written inside. The distracters in different conditions were hypothesized to access the semantic/conceptual level to varying degrees, in accordance with a connectionist model of language processing. Across all participants, real-word distracters were associated with lower accuracy and slower RTs than all other distracters. In general, RT interference varied with the nature of the distracter: words that accessed the semantic level more directly were associated with greater interference, and words that did not access the semantic level produced less interference. No monolingual-bilingual group differences were observed on this task. This study illustrates the feasibility of applying connectionist processing models to language tasks of inhibition. Implications of these results for current explanations of the bilingual inhibitory advantage are discussed. Medicine, Faculty of Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of Graduate 2011-02-18T23:24:59Z 2011-02-18T23:24:59Z 2007 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/31552 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description This study investigated the effect of bilingualism on children's performance on two tasks of inhibition. English monolinguals (n =21) and successive Chinese-English bilinguals (n =21) in Grade 2 (ages 7-8) completed the Simon task and a picture-word Stroop task. Both tasks required the inhibition of perceptual attributes of the stimuli; certain conditions of the picture-word Stroop task also required inhibition of conceptual information. In the Simon task, children were required to ignore salient spatial cues and respond only to stimulus colour. As expected, both the monolingual and bilingual groups in this study showed faster RTs on the condition that did not involve a spatial conflict than the one that involved a spatial conflict. In contrast with previous research findings, however, a bilingual group advantage was not observed on this task. In the picture-word Stroop task, children had to name pictures with or without incongruent words written inside. The distracters in different conditions were hypothesized to access the semantic/conceptual level to varying degrees, in accordance with a connectionist model of language processing. Across all participants, real-word distracters were associated with lower accuracy and slower RTs than all other distracters. In general, RT interference varied with the nature of the distracter: words that accessed the semantic level more directly were associated with greater interference, and words that did not access the semantic level produced less interference. No monolingual-bilingual group differences were observed on this task. This study illustrates the feasibility of applying connectionist processing models to language tasks of inhibition. Implications of these results for current explanations of the bilingual inhibitory advantage are discussed. === Medicine, Faculty of === Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of === Graduate
author Campbell, Kristina J.
spellingShingle Campbell, Kristina J.
Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children
author_facet Campbell, Kristina J.
author_sort Campbell, Kristina J.
title Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children
title_short Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children
title_full Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children
title_fullStr Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children
title_full_unstemmed Simon and picture-word Stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children
title_sort simon and picture-word stroop tasks of inhibition in monolingual and bilingual grade 2 children
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/31552
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellkristinaj simonandpicturewordstrooptasksofinhibitioninmonolingualandbilingualgrade2children
_version_ 1718594473743613952