Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice

Sadleir (1965) proposes that the survival of juvenile deermice is determined by the aggressiveness of the adult population. During the summer, when adult aggression is high, juvenile survival is poor, but in the fall, when adult aggression is low, juveniles survive well. The purpose of this study is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Healey, Michael Charles
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/36835
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-36835
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-368352018-01-05T17:48:37Z Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice Healey, Michael Charles Peromyscus maniculatus Animal populations Sadleir (1965) proposes that the survival of juvenile deermice is determined by the aggressiveness of the adult population. During the summer, when adult aggression is high, juvenile survival is poor, but in the fall, when adult aggression is low, juveniles survive well. The purpose of this study is to examine some of the consequences of Sadleir's hypothesis experimentally. Sadleir bases his hypothesis on the observation that the aggressiveness of males changes seasonally. This premise has been reexamined and confirmed. How adult aggression affects juveniles was studied first in the laboratory. Juveniles grow poorly when competing with adults in their home cage. Males appear to be more active aggressors than females, but only aggressive males are capable of inhibiting juvenile growth. Even though juveniles grew slowly when competing with aggressive adults, they seldom died from encounters with adults. In order to avoid the crowded conditions and confinement implicit in the laboratory experiments, the relationship between adult aggressiveness and juvenile growth and survival was reexamined in field experiments. Two partly isolated plots of habitat were used, and on these plots artificial populations of aggressive or docile male deermice were established. Juveniles were then released onto the plots, and their growth and survival followed. In the field, as in the laboratory, juveniles grew poorly when competing with aggressive adults. Since emigration was not restricted in the field, however, juveniles disappeared in significantly greater numbers when the adult population was aggressive than when the adult population was docile. In addition to these experiments, the success of immigrants onto trapped out plots and plots with a resident population was examined. Immigrants were more successful in establishing themselves on trapped out plots. All the data collected support Sadleir's hypothesis, and it seems reasonable to conclude that the correlation he drew between adult aggressiveness and juvenile survival is real. However, the data collected also provide some interesting clues as to the organization of deermouse populations. An organization is proposed in which the social unit is an animal and its immediate neighbours. Within the social unit mutual antagonism is reduced. But the members of the unit maintain a high level of aggressiveness, and are intolerant of any stranger that wanders into their home ranges. The system proposed would prevent immigrants from settling, while conserving energy by reducing antagonism between familiar animals. The system would also effectively regulate population size. Science, Faculty of Zoology, Department of Graduate 2011-08-22T20:31:35Z 2011-08-22T20:31:35Z 1966 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/36835 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Peromyscus maniculatus
Animal populations
spellingShingle Peromyscus maniculatus
Animal populations
Healey, Michael Charles
Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice
description Sadleir (1965) proposes that the survival of juvenile deermice is determined by the aggressiveness of the adult population. During the summer, when adult aggression is high, juvenile survival is poor, but in the fall, when adult aggression is low, juveniles survive well. The purpose of this study is to examine some of the consequences of Sadleir's hypothesis experimentally. Sadleir bases his hypothesis on the observation that the aggressiveness of males changes seasonally. This premise has been reexamined and confirmed. How adult aggression affects juveniles was studied first in the laboratory. Juveniles grow poorly when competing with adults in their home cage. Males appear to be more active aggressors than females, but only aggressive males are capable of inhibiting juvenile growth. Even though juveniles grew slowly when competing with aggressive adults, they seldom died from encounters with adults. In order to avoid the crowded conditions and confinement implicit in the laboratory experiments, the relationship between adult aggressiveness and juvenile growth and survival was reexamined in field experiments. Two partly isolated plots of habitat were used, and on these plots artificial populations of aggressive or docile male deermice were established. Juveniles were then released onto the plots, and their growth and survival followed. In the field, as in the laboratory, juveniles grew poorly when competing with aggressive adults. Since emigration was not restricted in the field, however, juveniles disappeared in significantly greater numbers when the adult population was aggressive than when the adult population was docile. In addition to these experiments, the success of immigrants onto trapped out plots and plots with a resident population was examined. Immigrants were more successful in establishing themselves on trapped out plots. All the data collected support Sadleir's hypothesis, and it seems reasonable to conclude that the correlation he drew between adult aggressiveness and juvenile survival is real. However, the data collected also provide some interesting clues as to the organization of deermouse populations. An organization is proposed in which the social unit is an animal and its immediate neighbours. Within the social unit mutual antagonism is reduced. But the members of the unit maintain a high level of aggressiveness, and are intolerant of any stranger that wanders into their home ranges. The system proposed would prevent immigrants from settling, while conserving energy by reducing antagonism between familiar animals. The system would also effectively regulate population size. === Science, Faculty of === Zoology, Department of === Graduate
author Healey, Michael Charles
author_facet Healey, Michael Charles
author_sort Healey, Michael Charles
title Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice
title_short Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice
title_full Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice
title_fullStr Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice
title_full_unstemmed Aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice
title_sort aggression and self-regulation of population size in deermice
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/36835
work_keys_str_mv AT healeymichaelcharles aggressionandselfregulationofpopulationsizeindeermice
_version_ 1718595790338785280