Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury

Spasticity is a common consequence of upper motor neuron lesions such as spinal cord injury (SCI). Spasticity is experienced by 65-78% of individuals with SCI. Spasticity management is one of the most important challenges that clinicians and researchers encounter. Physical therapy techniques are the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sadeghi, Mahsa
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/46711
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-46711
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-467112018-01-05T17:27:22Z Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury Sadeghi, Mahsa Spasticity is a common consequence of upper motor neuron lesions such as spinal cord injury (SCI). Spasticity is experienced by 65-78% of individuals with SCI. Spasticity management is one of the most important challenges that clinicians and researchers encounter. Physical therapy techniques are the essential component of spasticity management that are used during and after other spasticity management tools. Vibration and standing training are two physiotherapy techniques that might be beneficial to manage spasticity in individuals with SCI. This thesis is divided into two major parts to study how these two physiotherapy techniques are useful to manage spasticity in individuals with SCI. The first study was a systemic review exploring how effective whole body and focal vibration are for spasticity management in individuals with SCI. The second study was a cross-over study that evaluated the difference between the effects of static and dynamic (using the Segway) standing training on spasticity immediately and one hour after the interventions in individuals with SCI. Spasticity was measured by three different outcome measures including self-assessment (visual analog scale), clinical (Modified Ashworth Scale), and electrophysiologic (electromyography) measures. There was evidence to support the decreasing effects of either whole body or focal vibration on spasticity in individuals with SCI. There was no statistically significant difference between the dynamic and static standing interventions for spasticity reduction. We concluded that vibration (focal and whole body) has promising effects for spasticity reduction in individuals with SCI. We also concluded that dynamic standing training has no greater effect on spasticity reduction compared to the static standing training. Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Division of Graduate 2014-05-09T13:29:58Z 2014-05-09T13:29:58Z 2014 2014-09 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/46711 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Spasticity is a common consequence of upper motor neuron lesions such as spinal cord injury (SCI). Spasticity is experienced by 65-78% of individuals with SCI. Spasticity management is one of the most important challenges that clinicians and researchers encounter. Physical therapy techniques are the essential component of spasticity management that are used during and after other spasticity management tools. Vibration and standing training are two physiotherapy techniques that might be beneficial to manage spasticity in individuals with SCI. This thesis is divided into two major parts to study how these two physiotherapy techniques are useful to manage spasticity in individuals with SCI. The first study was a systemic review exploring how effective whole body and focal vibration are for spasticity management in individuals with SCI. The second study was a cross-over study that evaluated the difference between the effects of static and dynamic (using the Segway) standing training on spasticity immediately and one hour after the interventions in individuals with SCI. Spasticity was measured by three different outcome measures including self-assessment (visual analog scale), clinical (Modified Ashworth Scale), and electrophysiologic (electromyography) measures. There was evidence to support the decreasing effects of either whole body or focal vibration on spasticity in individuals with SCI. There was no statistically significant difference between the dynamic and static standing interventions for spasticity reduction. We concluded that vibration (focal and whole body) has promising effects for spasticity reduction in individuals with SCI. We also concluded that dynamic standing training has no greater effect on spasticity reduction compared to the static standing training. === Medicine, Faculty of === Medicine, Department of === Experimental Medicine, Division of === Graduate
author Sadeghi, Mahsa
spellingShingle Sadeghi, Mahsa
Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury
author_facet Sadeghi, Mahsa
author_sort Sadeghi, Mahsa
title Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_short Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_full Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_fullStr Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_full_unstemmed Vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_sort vibration, static standing, dynamic standing, and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/46711
work_keys_str_mv AT sadeghimahsa vibrationstaticstandingdynamicstandingandspasticityinindividualswithspinalcordinjury
_version_ 1718584273499324416