| Summary: | One of the fundamental roles that urban parks play is to serve as a reflection of public sentiment
concerning relationships with nature. Within a shared social context, each person comes to her or his own understanding of an agreeable way to interact with the urban natural environment. The
construction of this understanding is dynamic. It occurs as an ongoing process of internalization
of culturally determined ethical perspectives and of reflection on experiences created through
individual circumstance. Differences in this understanding shape different expectations for what is an appropriate way to relate to urban nature.
Addressing the array of simultaneously occurring expectations the public has for experiencing nature in the city is an-ongoing project in the planning and design of urban parks. This study makes a significant contribution to the challenges facing park planning in North America by documenting public ideas about the purpose, intent and use of urban natural area park land. It suggests a model for understanding the various relationships people have with the natural environment. The study suggests, as well, that the romanticized view of wilderness is profoundly influential in shaping urban nature. These concerns are explored within the general theoretical context of ideas about nature and creating meaning from experiences, and through analysis of results of a public survey conducted in Calgary, Alberta.
The model developed in this study presents a psychographic profile of four basic modes of
interacting with nature and explains how these relationships are reflected in expectations for the
provision of urban nature experiences. The Consumer, Adventurer, Steward and Guardian all are
oriented differently toward the planning, care and management of urban natural area park land.
Together they form a composite outlook on the urban natural environment that can best be
described as cautious consumption. The study raises the possibility that subsequent research could
work to explore shared expectations among the various orientations, especially concerning whether
to leave more park land in a natural state or to continue to provide the traditional variety of park
types in urban communities. It stresses the need to broaden planning goals to attend to sociocultural,
biophysical, and psychological aspects of urban natural area parks. === Applied Science, Faculty of === Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), School of === Graduate
|
|---|
