The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario

In 1912 in Toronto the Congregationalist lay minister, Robert B. St. Clair was arrested and convicted of circulating obscene literature, after he published and distributed an explicit description of a performance called The Darlings of Paris that played at a local burlesque house called the Star T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Campbell, Lyndsay Mills
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8904
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-8904
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-89042018-01-05T17:34:25Z The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario Campbell, Lyndsay Mills Obscenity (Law) -- Ontario. In 1912 in Toronto the Congregationalist lay minister, Robert B. St. Clair was arrested and convicted of circulating obscene literature, after he published and distributed an explicit description of a performance called The Darlings of Paris that played at a local burlesque house called the Star Theatre. St. Clair's experiences and its aftermath provide a lens through which to view the problem that the regulation of obscenity posed for moral reformers in Toronto during this period. Adopting a broad understanding of the concept of regulation and paying close attention to the discourses evident in a variety of primary sources, this thesis examines the St. Clair case against its religious, literary, social and legal backdrop. It discusses the origins of Canadian obscenity law and contrasts the regulation of the obscene in Canada during this period with the situation in England and the United States. This thesis shows that the ability of moral reformers in Toronto to regulate obscenity, and the Toronto stage in particular, was on the decline by 1913. Doubt was creeping into legal and extra-legal discourses that the words obscene, indecent and immoral had absolutely certain meanings, but there was still substantial certainty that art was morally uplifting. The sense that art could have immoral, indecent or pornographic aspects, and could therefore be difficult to distinguish from obscenity, had not yet entered Canada's, and particularly Ontario's, legal sensibility, but it was on its way. Law, Peter A. Allard School of Graduate 2009-06-09T21:26:44Z 2009-06-09T21:26:44Z 1998 1999-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8904 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 15769726 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Obscenity (Law) -- Ontario.
spellingShingle Obscenity (Law) -- Ontario.
Campbell, Lyndsay Mills
The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario
description In 1912 in Toronto the Congregationalist lay minister, Robert B. St. Clair was arrested and convicted of circulating obscene literature, after he published and distributed an explicit description of a performance called The Darlings of Paris that played at a local burlesque house called the Star Theatre. St. Clair's experiences and its aftermath provide a lens through which to view the problem that the regulation of obscenity posed for moral reformers in Toronto during this period. Adopting a broad understanding of the concept of regulation and paying close attention to the discourses evident in a variety of primary sources, this thesis examines the St. Clair case against its religious, literary, social and legal backdrop. It discusses the origins of Canadian obscenity law and contrasts the regulation of the obscene in Canada during this period with the situation in England and the United States. This thesis shows that the ability of moral reformers in Toronto to regulate obscenity, and the Toronto stage in particular, was on the decline by 1913. Doubt was creeping into legal and extra-legal discourses that the words obscene, indecent and immoral had absolutely certain meanings, but there was still substantial certainty that art was morally uplifting. The sense that art could have immoral, indecent or pornographic aspects, and could therefore be difficult to distinguish from obscenity, had not yet entered Canada's, and particularly Ontario's, legal sensibility, but it was on its way. === Law, Peter A. Allard School of === Graduate
author Campbell, Lyndsay Mills
author_facet Campbell, Lyndsay Mills
author_sort Campbell, Lyndsay Mills
title The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario
title_short The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario
title_full The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario
title_fullStr The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario
title_full_unstemmed The St. Clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-World War One Ontario
title_sort st. clair case and the regulation of the obscene in pre-world war one ontario
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8904
work_keys_str_mv AT campbelllyndsaymills thestclaircaseandtheregulationoftheobsceneinpreworldwaroneontario
AT campbelllyndsaymills stclaircaseandtheregulationoftheobsceneinpreworldwaroneontario
_version_ 1718588116553433088