John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening

<p>This dissertation concerns itself primarily with deconstruction theory and a number of readings of this novel within the ambit of deconstruction. According to Derrida there is not a single deconstruction and in response to this remark this study undertakes more than one deconstructive readi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: van Reenen, Sandra Elizabeth
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_1321_1381326113
id ndltd-UNWC-oai-UWC_ETD-http%3A%2F%2Fetd.uwc.ac.za%2Findex.php%3Fmodule%3Detd%26action%3Dviewtitle%26id%3Dgen8Srv25Nme4_1321_1381326113
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UNWC-oai-UWC_ETD-http%3A%2F%2Fetd.uwc.ac.za%2Findex.php%3Fmodule%3Detd%26action%3Dviewtitle%26id%3Dgen8Srv25Nme4_1321_13813261132013-10-10T04:36:33Z John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening van Reenen, Sandra Elizabeth John Miles <p>This dissertation concerns itself primarily with deconstruction theory and a number of readings of this novel within the ambit of deconstruction. According to Derrida there is not a single deconstruction and in response to this remark this study undertakes more than one deconstructive reading of the same novel. These different readings are introduced by a preliminary reading of the paratext and a cryptic reading which acknowledges the fragmentary nature of this novel. Hereafter a deconstruction of the novel follows in two phases, of which the first phase focuses on the process of its production. The non-fictitious documents on which the novel is based are revealed and exposed as building blocks during this reading. The second phase of the deconstructive reading is divided into two parts. The first part is based on Derrida&rsquo s dredging machine metaphor which introduces and illustrates the concept of random reading. During this phase the novel is acknowledged and read as an intertextual reconstruction. The non-fictitious documents are acknowledged as an archive within the context of recent as well as less recent South African history which serves as intertexts along with other texts. The second part of the second phase involves a reading of this novel as an anti- Hegelian text. Hegel&rsquo s concepts of the state and law are brought into the reading process. The reading focuses on the Apartheid State, the police force as an instrument of the state, and offers a critique on the discriminatory laws and the Constitution of the time period within which the novel is contextualised.</p> 2012 Thesis and dissertation Pdf http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_1321_1381326113 English ZA Copyright: University of the Western Cape
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic John Miles
spellingShingle John Miles
van Reenen, Sandra Elizabeth
John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening
description <p>This dissertation concerns itself primarily with deconstruction theory and a number of readings of this novel within the ambit of deconstruction. According to Derrida there is not a single deconstruction and in response to this remark this study undertakes more than one deconstructive reading of the same novel. These different readings are introduced by a preliminary reading of the paratext and a cryptic reading which acknowledges the fragmentary nature of this novel. Hereafter a deconstruction of the novel follows in two phases, of which the first phase focuses on the process of its production. The non-fictitious documents on which the novel is based are revealed and exposed as building blocks during this reading. The second phase of the deconstructive reading is divided into two parts. The first part is based on Derrida&rsquo === s dredging machine metaphor which introduces and illustrates the concept of random reading. During this phase the novel is acknowledged and read as an intertextual reconstruction. The non-fictitious documents are acknowledged as an archive within the context of recent as well as less recent South African history which serves as intertexts along with other texts. The second part of the second phase involves a reading of this novel as an anti- Hegelian text. Hegel&rsquo === s concepts of the state and law are brought into the reading process. The reading focuses on the Apartheid State, the police force as an instrument of the state, and offers a critique on the discriminatory laws and the Constitution of the time period within which the novel is contextualised.</p>
author van Reenen, Sandra Elizabeth
author_facet van Reenen, Sandra Elizabeth
author_sort van Reenen, Sandra Elizabeth
title John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening
title_short John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening
title_full John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening
title_fullStr John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening
title_full_unstemmed John Miles, Kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening
title_sort john miles, kroniek uit die doofpot, polisieroman: ’n dekonstruktiewe leesoefening
publishDate 2012
url http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_1321_1381326113
work_keys_str_mv AT vanreenensandraelizabeth johnmileskroniekuitdiedoofpotpolisieromanandekonstruktieweleesoefening
_version_ 1716604138916151296