Varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?

Some states, like Israel and USA, has carried out preventive attacks on other states’ nuclear programs. The attacked stated have been autocracies rising in power with a violent history and with a different political orientation than those attacking. However, there are states that have fulfilled the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laurell, Freddy
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Försvarshögskolan 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-7300
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-fhs-7300
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-fhs-73002018-03-27T05:04:32ZVarför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?sweLaurell, FreddyFörsvarshögskolan2017KärnvapenprogramIsrael IrakIranVan Everaförebyggande attackerPreventive attackPolitical ScienceStatsvetenskapSome states, like Israel and USA, has carried out preventive attacks on other states’ nuclear programs. The attacked stated have been autocracies rising in power with a violent history and with a different political orientation than those attacking. However, there are states that have fulfilled the same criteria, but that has not been attacked. What motivates a state, due to relative power, to attack another states’ nuclear program? Israel has attacked nuclear plants both in Iraq and Syria, two autocratic states that has been aggressive towards Israel. Iran, which is another state that is acting aggressive towards Israel and has a developing nuclear program, has not been preventively attacked. The purpose of this study is to find out what generally motivates states to attack nuclear programs, and particularly why Israel in particular has not bombed Iran’s nuclear program. A comparative case study with text and data analysis has been used. The comparison is between Iraq in 1981 and Iran 2009-2013 and the analysis consists of questions about Iraq and Iran in relation to Israel about regime type, military capacity, threats and violent conflicts. The result of the analysis shows that Israel has not attacked Iran because there is no history of violent conflicts between the two countries. Israel, on the other hand, has been at war with Iraq several times. Increasing power in a state that possesses nuclear weapons appears more threatening if there is a history of violent conflicts. This is probably the case with Israel and Iran since the definition of power in this study handles only military capability. More investigation on the subject is needed due to this narrow definition of power. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-7300application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Kärnvapenprogram
Israel Irak
Iran
Van Evera
förebyggande attacker
Preventive attack
Political Science
Statsvetenskap
spellingShingle Kärnvapenprogram
Israel Irak
Iran
Van Evera
förebyggande attacker
Preventive attack
Political Science
Statsvetenskap
Laurell, Freddy
Varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?
description Some states, like Israel and USA, has carried out preventive attacks on other states’ nuclear programs. The attacked stated have been autocracies rising in power with a violent history and with a different political orientation than those attacking. However, there are states that have fulfilled the same criteria, but that has not been attacked. What motivates a state, due to relative power, to attack another states’ nuclear program? Israel has attacked nuclear plants both in Iraq and Syria, two autocratic states that has been aggressive towards Israel. Iran, which is another state that is acting aggressive towards Israel and has a developing nuclear program, has not been preventively attacked. The purpose of this study is to find out what generally motivates states to attack nuclear programs, and particularly why Israel in particular has not bombed Iran’s nuclear program. A comparative case study with text and data analysis has been used. The comparison is between Iraq in 1981 and Iran 2009-2013 and the analysis consists of questions about Iraq and Iran in relation to Israel about regime type, military capacity, threats and violent conflicts. The result of the analysis shows that Israel has not attacked Iran because there is no history of violent conflicts between the two countries. Israel, on the other hand, has been at war with Iraq several times. Increasing power in a state that possesses nuclear weapons appears more threatening if there is a history of violent conflicts. This is probably the case with Israel and Iran since the definition of power in this study handles only military capability. More investigation on the subject is needed due to this narrow definition of power.
author Laurell, Freddy
author_facet Laurell, Freddy
author_sort Laurell, Freddy
title Varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?
title_short Varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?
title_full Varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?
title_fullStr Varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?
title_full_unstemmed Varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?
title_sort varför sker förebyggande aktioner mot kärnvapenprogram?
publisher Försvarshögskolan
publishDate 2017
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-7300
work_keys_str_mv AT laurellfreddy varforskerforebyggandeaktionermotkarnvapenprogram
_version_ 1718617171213418496