Barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living Labs

The importance for companies in knowledge or technology intensive industries to take part in research partnerships has been thoroughly researched, and the gain of collaboration with external parties has been proven. One of these most influential collaboration types is the one between academia and in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Englund, Mikael, Felice, Quentin
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för ekonomi och teknik (SET) 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-14000
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hh-14000
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hh-140002013-01-08T13:28:08ZBarriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living LabsengEnglund, MikaelFelice, QuentinHögskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för ekonomi och teknik (SET)Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för ekonomi och teknik (SET)2010Industry-university collaborationbarriersknowledge industryLiving Labsmilieu for innovationplatformtriple helixThe importance for companies in knowledge or technology intensive industries to take part in research partnerships has been thoroughly researched, and the gain of collaboration with external parties has been proven. One of these most influential collaboration types is the one between academia and industry, where the US Bayh-Dole Act provided a break-through policy change for the transfer, conversion and commercialization of knowledge and innovations. To counter this, the European Union has implemented a policy around a facilitating, user-centered milieu for innovation called Living Labs. In this article, the purpose is to identify potential collaboration barriers in the university-industry collaboration when implemented in this milieu. This is done by using a multiple case study where the respondents are seven individuals, from three Living Lab entities and two companies. The findings show that the inclusion of users give the setting its advantage, but also gives additional management needs, something that applies to all participants in the setting – the company representatives must have a diverse set of abilities, the researchers should be standalone and independent from the Living Labs management, the management must establish a shared physical context for all parties to interact within and there must be a very clear agreement between all parties what there are expecting from the collaboration regarding outcomes, process and structure. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-14000application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Industry-university collaboration
barriers
knowledge industry
Living Labs
milieu for innovation
platform
triple helix
spellingShingle Industry-university collaboration
barriers
knowledge industry
Living Labs
milieu for innovation
platform
triple helix
Englund, Mikael
Felice, Quentin
Barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living Labs
description The importance for companies in knowledge or technology intensive industries to take part in research partnerships has been thoroughly researched, and the gain of collaboration with external parties has been proven. One of these most influential collaboration types is the one between academia and industry, where the US Bayh-Dole Act provided a break-through policy change for the transfer, conversion and commercialization of knowledge and innovations. To counter this, the European Union has implemented a policy around a facilitating, user-centered milieu for innovation called Living Labs. In this article, the purpose is to identify potential collaboration barriers in the university-industry collaboration when implemented in this milieu. This is done by using a multiple case study where the respondents are seven individuals, from three Living Lab entities and two companies. The findings show that the inclusion of users give the setting its advantage, but also gives additional management needs, something that applies to all participants in the setting – the company representatives must have a diverse set of abilities, the researchers should be standalone and independent from the Living Labs management, the management must establish a shared physical context for all parties to interact within and there must be a very clear agreement between all parties what there are expecting from the collaboration regarding outcomes, process and structure.
author Englund, Mikael
Felice, Quentin
author_facet Englund, Mikael
Felice, Quentin
author_sort Englund, Mikael
title Barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living Labs
title_short Barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living Labs
title_full Barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living Labs
title_fullStr Barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living Labs
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the Living Labs
title_sort barriers and outcomes of the collaboration between industry and academia in a new approach: the living labs
publisher Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för ekonomi och teknik (SET)
publishDate 2010
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-14000
work_keys_str_mv AT englundmikael barriersandoutcomesofthecollaborationbetweenindustryandacademiainanewapproachthelivinglabs
AT felicequentin barriersandoutcomesofthecollaborationbetweenindustryandacademiainanewapproachthelivinglabs
_version_ 1716521082147569664