Evaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle Eyes

In a time when cattle herds grow continually larger the need for automatic methods to detect diseases is ever increasing. One possible method to discover diseases is to use thermal images and automatic head and eye detectors. In this thesis an eye detector and a head detector is implemented using th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sandsveden, Daniel
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Linköpings universitet, Datorseende 2015
Subjects:
HOG
LBP
SVM
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-121540
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-121540
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-1215402015-09-30T04:32:47ZEvaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle EyesengSandsveden, DanielLinköpings universitet, DatorseendeLinköpings universitet, Tekniska fakulteten2015Random ForestsHOGLBPSVMDescriptorClassifierIn a time when cattle herds grow continually larger the need for automatic methods to detect diseases is ever increasing. One possible method to discover diseases is to use thermal images and automatic head and eye detectors. In this thesis an eye detector and a head detector is implemented using the Random Forests classifier. During the implementation the classifier is evaluated using three different descriptors: Histogram of Oriented Gradients, Local Binary Patterns, and a descriptor based on pixel differences. An alternative classifier, the Support Vector Machine, is also evaluated for comparison against Random Forests. The thesis results show that Histogram of Oriented Gradients performs well as a description of cattle heads, while Local Binary Patterns performs well as a description of cattle eyes. The provided descriptor performs almost equally well in both cases. The results also show that Random Forests performs approximately as good as the Support Vector Machine, when the Support Vector Machine is paired with Local Binary Patterns for both heads and eyes. Finally the thesis results indicate that it is easier to detect and locate cattle heads than it is to detect and locate cattle eyes. For eyes, combining a head detector and an eye detector is shown to give a better result than only using an eye detector. In this combination heads are first detected in images, followed by using the eye detector in areas classified as heads. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-121540application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Random Forests
HOG
LBP
SVM
Descriptor
Classifier
spellingShingle Random Forests
HOG
LBP
SVM
Descriptor
Classifier
Sandsveden, Daniel
Evaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle Eyes
description In a time when cattle herds grow continually larger the need for automatic methods to detect diseases is ever increasing. One possible method to discover diseases is to use thermal images and automatic head and eye detectors. In this thesis an eye detector and a head detector is implemented using the Random Forests classifier. During the implementation the classifier is evaluated using three different descriptors: Histogram of Oriented Gradients, Local Binary Patterns, and a descriptor based on pixel differences. An alternative classifier, the Support Vector Machine, is also evaluated for comparison against Random Forests. The thesis results show that Histogram of Oriented Gradients performs well as a description of cattle heads, while Local Binary Patterns performs well as a description of cattle eyes. The provided descriptor performs almost equally well in both cases. The results also show that Random Forests performs approximately as good as the Support Vector Machine, when the Support Vector Machine is paired with Local Binary Patterns for both heads and eyes. Finally the thesis results indicate that it is easier to detect and locate cattle heads than it is to detect and locate cattle eyes. For eyes, combining a head detector and an eye detector is shown to give a better result than only using an eye detector. In this combination heads are first detected in images, followed by using the eye detector in areas classified as heads.
author Sandsveden, Daniel
author_facet Sandsveden, Daniel
author_sort Sandsveden, Daniel
title Evaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle Eyes
title_short Evaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle Eyes
title_full Evaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle Eyes
title_fullStr Evaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle Eyes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Random Forests for Detection and Localization of Cattle Eyes
title_sort evaluation of random forests for detection and localization of cattle eyes
publisher Linköpings universitet, Datorseende
publishDate 2015
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-121540
work_keys_str_mv AT sandsvedendaniel evaluationofrandomforestsfordetectionandlocalizationofcattleeyes
_version_ 1716824897449099264