Catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff

Eight agricultural catchments in south Sweden were investigated for factors that may affect phosphorus (P) load and retention in the downstream situated wetlands (WL). P load is known to affect retention, and is determined by hydrological and geographical catchment characteristics. The wetlands were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Senior, Anna
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Linköpings universitet, Biologi 2012
Subjects:
GIS
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-74262
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-74262
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-742622013-01-08T13:38:33ZCatchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoffengSenior, AnnaLinköpings universitet, BiologiLinköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolan2012Agricultural runoffCatchment characteristicsClayConstructed wetlandsGISPhosphorus retentionEight agricultural catchments in south Sweden were investigated for factors that may affect phosphorus (P) load and retention in the downstream situated wetlands (WL). P load is known to affect retention, and is determined by hydrological and geographical catchment characteristics. The wetlands were small (0.02-0.88%) in relation to their catchments (CA) and varied in design. Net sedimentation and P retention was determined with sedimentation plates during one year. The variables that best explained differences in particles and TP retention were the hydraulic load (q), TP load and the wetland length to width ratio. Contrary to expectations there was no correlation between factors that could be associated with erosion (i.e. slope and soil clay content) and retention of neither particles nor TP. Generally, the highest amounts of settled particles and P were found close to the wetland inlets, but soil disturbance (i.e. tillage) and high q increased the settling distance. It was likely that the smallest clay particles were too unaggregated to settle within these wetlands. Factors not included, such as wetland vegetation and bioturbation may have a large impact on P retention and this should be further investigated. The study also points to the difficulties in scaling down geological and P loss data from a regional to a local scale, as there can be large local deviations from the regional standard values. An easy method for identification of local “hotspots” for P losses should be of value for planning the location of future wetlands. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-74262application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Agricultural runoff
Catchment characteristics
Clay
Constructed wetlands
GIS
Phosphorus retention
spellingShingle Agricultural runoff
Catchment characteristics
Clay
Constructed wetlands
GIS
Phosphorus retention
Senior, Anna
Catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff
description Eight agricultural catchments in south Sweden were investigated for factors that may affect phosphorus (P) load and retention in the downstream situated wetlands (WL). P load is known to affect retention, and is determined by hydrological and geographical catchment characteristics. The wetlands were small (0.02-0.88%) in relation to their catchments (CA) and varied in design. Net sedimentation and P retention was determined with sedimentation plates during one year. The variables that best explained differences in particles and TP retention were the hydraulic load (q), TP load and the wetland length to width ratio. Contrary to expectations there was no correlation between factors that could be associated with erosion (i.e. slope and soil clay content) and retention of neither particles nor TP. Generally, the highest amounts of settled particles and P were found close to the wetland inlets, but soil disturbance (i.e. tillage) and high q increased the settling distance. It was likely that the smallest clay particles were too unaggregated to settle within these wetlands. Factors not included, such as wetland vegetation and bioturbation may have a large impact on P retention and this should be further investigated. The study also points to the difficulties in scaling down geological and P loss data from a regional to a local scale, as there can be large local deviations from the regional standard values. An easy method for identification of local “hotspots” for P losses should be of value for planning the location of future wetlands.
author Senior, Anna
author_facet Senior, Anna
author_sort Senior, Anna
title Catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff
title_short Catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff
title_full Catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff
title_fullStr Catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff
title_full_unstemmed Catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff
title_sort catchment factors affecting particle and phosphorus retention in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural runoff
publisher Linköpings universitet, Biologi
publishDate 2012
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-74262
work_keys_str_mv AT senioranna catchmentfactorsaffectingparticleandphosphorusretentioninconstructedwetlandsreceivingagriculturalrunoff
_version_ 1716525116686336000