Frail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision Making

Background: In research, patient participation in medical decision-making has been shown to be associated with higher patient satisfaction and improvement of treatment outcomes. But when it comes to patient participation when being old and frail there are pitfalls and the research in this area is sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anne
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: Linköpings universitet, Hälsa, Aktivitet, Vård (HAV) 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-81408
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7519-947-4
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-81408
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
spellingShingle Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anne
Frail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision Making
description Background: In research, patient participation in medical decision-making has been shown to be associated with higher patient satisfaction and improvement of treatment outcomes. But when it comes to patient participation when being old and frail there are pitfalls and the research in this area is sparse. The aim of this thesis is to explore participation in medical decision making of the frail elderly patient in hospital from the perspectives of patients themselves and the health care staff. In this thesis frail, elderly patients is defined as individuals 75 years old or older, who during the past 12 months have received inpatient hospital care three or more times and who have three or more diagnoses in three or more diagnostic groups according to the classification system ICD-10. The participants were frail patients’ in hospital or newly discharged and it was health care personnel working with frail elderly patients. In three of the studies the method was mainly qualitative (Paper I, III, IV) and in one (Paper II) quantitative. The qualitative methods were one-to-one tape-recorded interviews of 25 patients (Paper I and IV), 18 personnel (III and IV), 5 focus group interviews of physicians (Paper III) and 26 days of observations in hospital wards (IV). Chosen methodologies of analysis were content analysis and Grounded Theory. The quantitative study (II) was a cross-sectional survey using telephone interviews with patients (n= 156). This material was descriptively analysed and examined using weighted kappa statistics. Results: The results reported in Paper II show that elderly patients generally want to participate more in medical decision making than they do, though preferences for degree of participation are highly individualized – both findings important to consider in clinical practice. According to the patients important key concepts of patient participation in medical decision making are to be listened to and to be informed (Paper I). The main reasons for not being able to participate included having many illnesses and generally, overall bad medical condition (Paper II). Also, cited as a problem was difficulty in understanding medical information, for example when given by a foreign-speaking physician (Paper I, II and IV). Frail, elderly patients complained that they were less informed than was their preference (Paper I, II and IV). Moderate agreement was obtained between patient’s preferred and actual roles in medical decision making. Patients often expressed gratitude and confidence in their health care (Paper I and IV), but also, sympathy for stressed health care personnel who had so much to do. The frail elderly patients do sometimes feel like a burden to the health care (Paper I and IV). The professionals gave expressions of trying to avoid taking care of frail elderly patients and at the same time expressions of frustration and bad conscience not being able to take good care of them due to lack of time and lack of beds (Paper III, IV). Especially the physicians felt they were trapped between the needs of the patients’ and the remunerations system rewarding time-constricted health care production (number of investigations, operations, easy accessibility) – not a time-consuming holistic view on all illnesses and medications including communication with the patients and all caregivers involved (Paper III). Both patients and the professionals perceive the hospital as some kind of “institution of power”, difficult to challenge, and the decisions of which one has to accept. Conclusion: In this thesis there are shown a number of challenges to participation in medical decision making by frail, elderly patients, which thus limits quality of care for this patient group. Health care is revealed as not well adapted to meet these patients’ complex needs. A model is presented that explains how the organisation of health care, and the reimbursement system, does not facilitate a holistic view. The health care professionals appear to adapt to the organisation and the remuneration system, which leads to practices, such as, rapid discharges and a tendency to examine the patient for only one or a few problems. Finally a suggestion for a model to improve care of frail elderly patients is presented. This model includes the need of more hospital wards being able to work with a holistic view, better skills in gerontology and geriatrics and a more adapted remuneration system for the frail, elderly patients.
author Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anne
author_facet Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anne
author_sort Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anne
title Frail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision Making
title_short Frail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision Making
title_full Frail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision Making
title_fullStr Frail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed Frail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision Making
title_sort frail and elderly hospital patients : the challenge of participation in medical decision making
publisher Linköpings universitet, Hälsa, Aktivitet, Vård (HAV)
publishDate 2012
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-81408
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7519-947-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wissendorffekdahlanne frailandelderlyhospitalpatientsthechallengeofparticipationinmedicaldecisionmaking
_version_ 1718494475336024064
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-814082017-07-08T05:52:15ZFrail and Elderly Hospital Patients : The Challenge of Participation in Medical Decision MakingengWissendorff Ekdahl, AnneLinköpings universitet, Hälsa, Aktivitet, Vård (HAV)Linköpings universitet, HälsouniversitetetLinköping2012Medical and Health SciencesMedicin och hälsovetenskapBackground: In research, patient participation in medical decision-making has been shown to be associated with higher patient satisfaction and improvement of treatment outcomes. But when it comes to patient participation when being old and frail there are pitfalls and the research in this area is sparse. The aim of this thesis is to explore participation in medical decision making of the frail elderly patient in hospital from the perspectives of patients themselves and the health care staff. In this thesis frail, elderly patients is defined as individuals 75 years old or older, who during the past 12 months have received inpatient hospital care three or more times and who have three or more diagnoses in three or more diagnostic groups according to the classification system ICD-10. The participants were frail patients’ in hospital or newly discharged and it was health care personnel working with frail elderly patients. In three of the studies the method was mainly qualitative (Paper I, III, IV) and in one (Paper II) quantitative. The qualitative methods were one-to-one tape-recorded interviews of 25 patients (Paper I and IV), 18 personnel (III and IV), 5 focus group interviews of physicians (Paper III) and 26 days of observations in hospital wards (IV). Chosen methodologies of analysis were content analysis and Grounded Theory. The quantitative study (II) was a cross-sectional survey using telephone interviews with patients (n= 156). This material was descriptively analysed and examined using weighted kappa statistics. Results: The results reported in Paper II show that elderly patients generally want to participate more in medical decision making than they do, though preferences for degree of participation are highly individualized – both findings important to consider in clinical practice. According to the patients important key concepts of patient participation in medical decision making are to be listened to and to be informed (Paper I). The main reasons for not being able to participate included having many illnesses and generally, overall bad medical condition (Paper II). Also, cited as a problem was difficulty in understanding medical information, for example when given by a foreign-speaking physician (Paper I, II and IV). Frail, elderly patients complained that they were less informed than was their preference (Paper I, II and IV). Moderate agreement was obtained between patient’s preferred and actual roles in medical decision making. Patients often expressed gratitude and confidence in their health care (Paper I and IV), but also, sympathy for stressed health care personnel who had so much to do. The frail elderly patients do sometimes feel like a burden to the health care (Paper I and IV). The professionals gave expressions of trying to avoid taking care of frail elderly patients and at the same time expressions of frustration and bad conscience not being able to take good care of them due to lack of time and lack of beds (Paper III, IV). Especially the physicians felt they were trapped between the needs of the patients’ and the remunerations system rewarding time-constricted health care production (number of investigations, operations, easy accessibility) – not a time-consuming holistic view on all illnesses and medications including communication with the patients and all caregivers involved (Paper III). Both patients and the professionals perceive the hospital as some kind of “institution of power”, difficult to challenge, and the decisions of which one has to accept. Conclusion: In this thesis there are shown a number of challenges to participation in medical decision making by frail, elderly patients, which thus limits quality of care for this patient group. Health care is revealed as not well adapted to meet these patients’ complex needs. A model is presented that explains how the organisation of health care, and the reimbursement system, does not facilitate a holistic view. The health care professionals appear to adapt to the organisation and the remuneration system, which leads to practices, such as, rapid discharges and a tendency to examine the patient for only one or a few problems. Finally a suggestion for a model to improve care of frail elderly patients is presented. This model includes the need of more hospital wards being able to work with a holistic view, better skills in gerontology and geriatrics and a more adapted remuneration system for the frail, elderly patients. Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summaryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-81408urn:isbn:978-91-7519-947-4Linköping University Medical Dissertations, 0345-0082 ; 1297application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess