Människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)

The main focus of this essay is to attempt to answer the question of how Mary Shelley in her novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818), and Kenneth Branagh in his film Frankenstein (1994) portray nature, the environment and the characters with the help of an ecocritical perspective, and h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Visilitskij, Egor
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Mittuniversitetet, Institutionen för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-42547
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-miun-42547
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-miun-425472021-07-03T05:24:04ZMänniskan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)sweVisilitskij, EgorMittuniversitetet, Institutionen för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap2021General Literature StudiesLitteraturvetenskapThe main focus of this essay is to attempt to answer the question of how Mary Shelley in her novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818), and Kenneth Branagh in his film Frankenstein (1994) portray nature, the environment and the characters with the help of an ecocritical perspective, and how Frankenstein could be used by high school teachers to teach students about the ecocritical perspective, but also the global sustainability goals. The questions that I have tried to answer in this analysis are: How is nature used in the two versions to reflect the main characters? How can the main characters in the two versions be interpreted from an ecocritical perspective? And how can these two versions of Frankenstein be used to inform students about the environment and sustainable development? The analysis has been conducted with the help of two ecocritical concepts, anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism, and with the help of these two concepts I have been able to draw the conclusion that the author and filmmaker present differences in nature and the environment depending on the situation, and I have also been able to present how a high school teacher could use Frankenstein to inform students about the ecocritical perspective and the global sustainability goals. <p>Godkänt datum 2021-06-01</p>Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-42547application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic General Literature Studies
Litteraturvetenskap
spellingShingle General Literature Studies
Litteraturvetenskap
Visilitskij, Egor
Människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)
description The main focus of this essay is to attempt to answer the question of how Mary Shelley in her novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818), and Kenneth Branagh in his film Frankenstein (1994) portray nature, the environment and the characters with the help of an ecocritical perspective, and how Frankenstein could be used by high school teachers to teach students about the ecocritical perspective, but also the global sustainability goals. The questions that I have tried to answer in this analysis are: How is nature used in the two versions to reflect the main characters? How can the main characters in the two versions be interpreted from an ecocritical perspective? And how can these two versions of Frankenstein be used to inform students about the environment and sustainable development? The analysis has been conducted with the help of two ecocritical concepts, anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism, and with the help of these two concepts I have been able to draw the conclusion that the author and filmmaker present differences in nature and the environment depending on the situation, and I have also been able to present how a high school teacher could use Frankenstein to inform students about the ecocritical perspective and the global sustainability goals. === <p>Godkänt datum 2021-06-01</p>
author Visilitskij, Egor
author_facet Visilitskij, Egor
author_sort Visilitskij, Egor
title Människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)
title_short Människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)
title_full Människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)
title_fullStr Människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)
title_full_unstemmed Människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : En ekokritisk analys av Mary Shelleys Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen Frankenstein (1994)
title_sort människan, naturen, monstret och vetenskapsmannen : en ekokritisk analys av mary shelleys frankenstein; or, the modern prometheus (1818) och filmatiseringen frankenstein (1994)
publisher Mittuniversitetet, Institutionen för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap
publishDate 2021
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-42547
work_keys_str_mv AT visilitskijegor manniskannaturenmonstretochvetenskapsmannenenekokritiskanalysavmaryshelleysfrankensteinorthemodernprometheus1818ochfilmatiseringenfrankenstein1994
_version_ 1719415497497247744