Evaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty

Introduction: Aseptic loosening is the most common indication for revision surgery of hipimplants. However, sometimes diagnosis from planar radiography is uncertain, makingdecision regarding revision surgery problematic. Implant Movement Analysis (IMA) is anewly introduced method of analysing uncert...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harbom, Ellen
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76218
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-76218
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-762182019-09-12T04:31:23ZEvaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplastyengHarbom, EllenÖrebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper2019Hip prosthesisImplant Movement AnalysisAseptic loosening Computed TomographyRadiography.Medical and Health SciencesMedicin och hälsovetenskapIntroduction: Aseptic loosening is the most common indication for revision surgery of hipimplants. However, sometimes diagnosis from planar radiography is uncertain, makingdecision regarding revision surgery problematic. Implant Movement Analysis (IMA) is anewly introduced method of analysing uncertain aseptic loosening of hip prostheses. It usescomputer tomography with rotational provocation to expose movement of the implantrelatively to the surrounding bone. Aim: To evaluate the role of IMA as a complementary method to planar radiography indiagnosing aseptic loosening of total hip artroplasty (THA) at Lindesberg Hospital. 1) HasIMA improved diagnosing of uncertain cases of aseptic loosening? 2) Has IMA reduced thenumber of unnecessary THA revision surgeries? Methods: Retrospective cohort study analysing 43 cases of uncertain aseptic looseningexamined with IMA at Lindesberg Hospital. Paired results from planar radiography and IMAwere statistically compared with McNemar’s test, IMA held as the reference. Additional datawas also collected (i.e. age and symptoms). Results: Planar radiography had 70 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity compared to certainresults from IMA. IMA provided diagnoses in 84 % of the cases and changed the diagnosisfor 33 % compared to planar radiography. Eight cases got their diagnosis changed from looseto not loose. Conclusions: IMA has improved diagnosing cases of uncertain aseptic loosening and cantherefore be seen as a good complementary method to planar radiography in these cases.However, as it is a new method further evaluation is needed. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76218application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Hip prosthesis
Implant Movement Analysis
Aseptic loosening Computed Tomography
Radiography.
Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
spellingShingle Hip prosthesis
Implant Movement Analysis
Aseptic loosening Computed Tomography
Radiography.
Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Harbom, Ellen
Evaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty
description Introduction: Aseptic loosening is the most common indication for revision surgery of hipimplants. However, sometimes diagnosis from planar radiography is uncertain, makingdecision regarding revision surgery problematic. Implant Movement Analysis (IMA) is anewly introduced method of analysing uncertain aseptic loosening of hip prostheses. It usescomputer tomography with rotational provocation to expose movement of the implantrelatively to the surrounding bone. Aim: To evaluate the role of IMA as a complementary method to planar radiography indiagnosing aseptic loosening of total hip artroplasty (THA) at Lindesberg Hospital. 1) HasIMA improved diagnosing of uncertain cases of aseptic loosening? 2) Has IMA reduced thenumber of unnecessary THA revision surgeries? Methods: Retrospective cohort study analysing 43 cases of uncertain aseptic looseningexamined with IMA at Lindesberg Hospital. Paired results from planar radiography and IMAwere statistically compared with McNemar’s test, IMA held as the reference. Additional datawas also collected (i.e. age and symptoms). Results: Planar radiography had 70 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity compared to certainresults from IMA. IMA provided diagnoses in 84 % of the cases and changed the diagnosisfor 33 % compared to planar radiography. Eight cases got their diagnosis changed from looseto not loose. Conclusions: IMA has improved diagnosing cases of uncertain aseptic loosening and cantherefore be seen as a good complementary method to planar radiography in these cases.However, as it is a new method further evaluation is needed.
author Harbom, Ellen
author_facet Harbom, Ellen
author_sort Harbom, Ellen
title Evaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty
title_short Evaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty
title_full Evaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Evaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the role of ImplantMovement Analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty
title_sort evaluation of the role of implantmovement analysis in diagnosing asepticloosening of total hip arthroplasty
publisher Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
publishDate 2019
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76218
work_keys_str_mv AT harbomellen evaluationoftheroleofimplantmovementanalysisindiagnosingasepticlooseningoftotalhiparthroplasty
_version_ 1719250368471236608