GAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och Irak

The year 2017 has gone into history for being an interesting year when it comes to regional struggles for independence. That is because in that year two referendums were proposed. One by the Catalans in Spain and the other by the Kurds in Iraq. Both referendum proposals were unsuccessful. However, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johansson, Marcus, Penahi, Milian
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76342
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-76342
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-763422019-09-14T04:31:17ZGAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och IraksweJohansson, MarcusPenahi, MilianÖrebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskapÖrebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap2019SecessionMinoritiesKurdistanIraqIranPolitical ScienceStatsvetenskapThe year 2017 has gone into history for being an interesting year when it comes to regional struggles for independence. That is because in that year two referendums were proposed. One by the Catalans in Spain and the other by the Kurds in Iraq. Both referendum proposals were unsuccessful. However, the struggle for autonomy and self-determination in an already sovereign state, is still an interesting area to study. Especially in the case of the Kurds, which are divided amongst four states in the middle east. The reasons behind that struggle and what they can tell about the independence claim as a whole, is something relevant to study in the area of political science. The objective of this study is to apply both classic and modern theories of secession on the Kurdish struggle for independence in the states of Iraq and Iran, to see if there is a covariance in the studied variables. The methodology of the study is a comparative analysis of the Most Similar Systems Design method, whereas the theory of the analysed objective is the theory of secession which has been created with the basis of Wood five criterions of secession. In addition to this analytical framework other theoretic aspects such as regional stability, the international community and economic factors have been added to support the secession theories and thereby creating a better degree of explanation. The analysis concluded that there could be seen a covariance of the secession theory and the regional self-determination and it concluded that Wood’s first criteria, the preconditions of secession, is the most important variable to study. The study couldn’t conclude which one of Wood´s preconditions that seemed to be the most important. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76342application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Secession
Minorities
Kurdistan
Iraq
Iran
Political Science
Statsvetenskap
spellingShingle Secession
Minorities
Kurdistan
Iraq
Iran
Political Science
Statsvetenskap
Johansson, Marcus
Penahi, Milian
GAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och Irak
description The year 2017 has gone into history for being an interesting year when it comes to regional struggles for independence. That is because in that year two referendums were proposed. One by the Catalans in Spain and the other by the Kurds in Iraq. Both referendum proposals were unsuccessful. However, the struggle for autonomy and self-determination in an already sovereign state, is still an interesting area to study. Especially in the case of the Kurds, which are divided amongst four states in the middle east. The reasons behind that struggle and what they can tell about the independence claim as a whole, is something relevant to study in the area of political science. The objective of this study is to apply both classic and modern theories of secession on the Kurdish struggle for independence in the states of Iraq and Iran, to see if there is a covariance in the studied variables. The methodology of the study is a comparative analysis of the Most Similar Systems Design method, whereas the theory of the analysed objective is the theory of secession which has been created with the basis of Wood five criterions of secession. In addition to this analytical framework other theoretic aspects such as regional stability, the international community and economic factors have been added to support the secession theories and thereby creating a better degree of explanation. The analysis concluded that there could be seen a covariance of the secession theory and the regional self-determination and it concluded that Wood’s first criteria, the preconditions of secession, is the most important variable to study. The study couldn’t conclude which one of Wood´s preconditions that seemed to be the most important.
author Johansson, Marcus
Penahi, Milian
author_facet Johansson, Marcus
Penahi, Milian
author_sort Johansson, Marcus
title GAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och Irak
title_short GAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och Irak
title_full GAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och Irak
title_fullStr GAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och Irak
title_full_unstemmed GAME OF THRONES -En komparativ studie av Kurderna i Iran och Irak
title_sort game of thrones -en komparativ studie av kurderna i iran och irak
publisher Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap
publishDate 2019
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76342
work_keys_str_mv AT johanssonmarcus gameofthronesenkomparativstudieavkurdernaiiranochirak
AT penahimilian gameofthronesenkomparativstudieavkurdernaiiranochirak
_version_ 1719250633940271104