Do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?

To the main part, this paper is the result of a literature survey and to the minor part of a field survey. The study is found on the question of, if and why unpalatable plant species invade heavily grassed rangelands and if plants change their defence strategy from a mechanical defence to a chemical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ohlsson, Åse
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-310
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-310
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-3102013-04-19T20:49:22ZDo plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?engOhlsson, ÅseSödertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaperHuddinge : Institutionen för kemi, biologi, geografi och miljövetenskap2005BetespåverkanbotanikförsvarsmekanismerBiologyBiologiTo the main part, this paper is the result of a literature survey and to the minor part of a field survey. The study is found on the question of, if and why unpalatable plant species invade heavily grassed rangelands and if plants change their defence strategy from a mechanical defence to a chemical defence if the herbivory pressure increase. I conclude that defended plants do invade heavily grassed rangelands if the rangelands lose essential recourses (often nutrients) and/or the defended plants are strongly avoided by mammalian herbivores. I also conclude that plants do go from a mechanical defence strategy to a chemical strategy if their environment loses essential recourses under a threshold. This firstly depends on that mechanical defended plants can not develop a complete defence if they suffer from a shortage in the nutrient supply, and secondly of that plants in resources rich environments often have lager possibilities of responding to herbivory with regrowth. They do not therefore have to defend them self as hard as plants in environments with low supply of recourses. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-310application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Betespåverkan
botanik
försvarsmekanismer
Biology
Biologi
spellingShingle Betespåverkan
botanik
försvarsmekanismer
Biology
Biologi
Ohlsson, Åse
Do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?
description To the main part, this paper is the result of a literature survey and to the minor part of a field survey. The study is found on the question of, if and why unpalatable plant species invade heavily grassed rangelands and if plants change their defence strategy from a mechanical defence to a chemical defence if the herbivory pressure increase. I conclude that defended plants do invade heavily grassed rangelands if the rangelands lose essential recourses (often nutrients) and/or the defended plants are strongly avoided by mammalian herbivores. I also conclude that plants do go from a mechanical defence strategy to a chemical strategy if their environment loses essential recourses under a threshold. This firstly depends on that mechanical defended plants can not develop a complete defence if they suffer from a shortage in the nutrient supply, and secondly of that plants in resources rich environments often have lager possibilities of responding to herbivory with regrowth. They do not therefore have to defend them self as hard as plants in environments with low supply of recourses.
author Ohlsson, Åse
author_facet Ohlsson, Åse
author_sort Ohlsson, Åse
title Do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?
title_short Do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?
title_full Do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?
title_fullStr Do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?
title_full_unstemmed Do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?
title_sort do plants change their defence strategy from a structural defence to a chemical one as a response to heavier herbivory?
publisher Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper
publishDate 2005
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-310
work_keys_str_mv AT ohlssonase doplantschangetheirdefencestrategyfromastructuraldefencetoachemicaloneasaresponsetoheavierherbivory
_version_ 1716582802972999680