En scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018

The intention of this essay is to examine how the political commentators from three different kinds of media (evening, morning, public service) portray the party leaders after the election of 2018 in Sweden. My first specific research task is to analyze how the commentators portray the party leaders...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Isaksson, Mikael
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och lärande 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-38015
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-38015
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-380152019-04-19T05:16:14ZEn scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018sweIsaksson, MikaelSödertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och lärande2018Dramatismpentadic analysisterministic screenssecond personapolitical commentatorOther Humanities not elsewhere specifiedÖvrig annan humanioraThe intention of this essay is to examine how the political commentators from three different kinds of media (evening, morning, public service) portray the party leaders after the election of 2018 in Sweden. My first specific research task is to analyze how the commentators portray the party leaders according to Kenneth Burke´s pentadic analysis. Hereafter, I aim to identify the intended audience that the commentator could have in mind. For this question it is important to analyze how they use language as a way to depict the political reality. The theoretical framework for this essay is based on Burke´s dramatism, terministic screens and identification, and Edwin Black´s second persona. The result shows that two of the commentators have fairly the same way to present the narrative of the dramatic pentad. They frequently highlight the purpose of the way the party leaders handle the situation. The other commentator, from the evening paper, strongly emphazises the lack of action from the politicians after the election. All commentators use a language that mostly depicts the politics as a game or strategy – but the tone differ from accusatory to understanding towards the party leaders. The analysis shows that the overall intended audience probably is quite politically interested, but from different political parties and ideologies. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-38015application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Dramatism
pentadic analysis
terministic screens
second persona
political commentator
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
Övrig annan humaniora
spellingShingle Dramatism
pentadic analysis
terministic screens
second persona
political commentator
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
Övrig annan humaniora
Isaksson, Mikael
En scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018
description The intention of this essay is to examine how the political commentators from three different kinds of media (evening, morning, public service) portray the party leaders after the election of 2018 in Sweden. My first specific research task is to analyze how the commentators portray the party leaders according to Kenneth Burke´s pentadic analysis. Hereafter, I aim to identify the intended audience that the commentator could have in mind. For this question it is important to analyze how they use language as a way to depict the political reality. The theoretical framework for this essay is based on Burke´s dramatism, terministic screens and identification, and Edwin Black´s second persona. The result shows that two of the commentators have fairly the same way to present the narrative of the dramatic pentad. They frequently highlight the purpose of the way the party leaders handle the situation. The other commentator, from the evening paper, strongly emphazises the lack of action from the politicians after the election. All commentators use a language that mostly depicts the politics as a game or strategy – but the tone differ from accusatory to understanding towards the party leaders. The analysis shows that the overall intended audience probably is quite politically interested, but from different political parties and ideologies.
author Isaksson, Mikael
author_facet Isaksson, Mikael
author_sort Isaksson, Mikael
title En scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018
title_short En scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018
title_full En scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018
title_fullStr En scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018
title_full_unstemmed En scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : En retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018
title_sort en scen, en publik, en politisk kommentator : en retorisk analys av politiska kommentatorers skildring av partiledarna efter valet 2018
publisher Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och lärande
publishDate 2018
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-38015
work_keys_str_mv AT isakssonmikael enscenenpublikenpolitiskkommentatorenretoriskanalysavpolitiskakommentatorersskildringavpartiledarnaeftervalet2018
_version_ 1719019846571655168