Does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?

Individuals with high working memory capacity (WMC) appear to be particularly good at focusing their attention (McCabe, Roediger, McDaniel, Balota, & Hambrick, 2010). Therefore, we studied the correlation between WMC and the ability to suppress neurological activity from a task-irrelevant st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skarp, Rasmus
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Stockholms universitet, Psykologiska institutionen 2018
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157258
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-157258
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-1572582018-07-04T06:29:58ZDoes working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?engSkarp, RasmusStockholms universitet, Psykologiska institutionen2018working memory capacityperceptual loadprocessingASSRauditory steady state responsesEEGPsychologyPsykologiIndividuals with high working memory capacity (WMC) appear to be particularly good at focusing their attention (McCabe, Roediger, McDaniel, Balota, & Hambrick, 2010). Therefore, we studied the correlation between WMC and the ability to suppress neurological activity from a task-irrelevant stimulus. The research question tests the foundations of Lavie’s perceptual load theory; that early selection occurs, by testing if higher WMC enhances people’s ability to inhibit processing of task-irrelevant stimuli from low versus high load (i.e. the difference from low to high load should be smaller for high WMC than for low WMC). This was operationalised by measuring the correlation of WMC and auditory processing under low versus high visual load. Auditory processing was measured with auditory steady state responses (ASSR), and WMC was measured with an operation-letter span task. The results showed no significant correlation between WMC and ability to suppress task-irrelevant stimuli. Based on the data, it is not possible to conclude with certainty that effects of load on auditory processing are unaffected by WMC, because confidence intervals were large. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157258application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic working memory capacity
perceptual load
processing
ASSR
auditory steady state responses
EEG
Psychology
Psykologi
spellingShingle working memory capacity
perceptual load
processing
ASSR
auditory steady state responses
EEG
Psychology
Psykologi
Skarp, Rasmus
Does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?
description Individuals with high working memory capacity (WMC) appear to be particularly good at focusing their attention (McCabe, Roediger, McDaniel, Balota, & Hambrick, 2010). Therefore, we studied the correlation between WMC and the ability to suppress neurological activity from a task-irrelevant stimulus. The research question tests the foundations of Lavie’s perceptual load theory; that early selection occurs, by testing if higher WMC enhances people’s ability to inhibit processing of task-irrelevant stimuli from low versus high load (i.e. the difference from low to high load should be smaller for high WMC than for low WMC). This was operationalised by measuring the correlation of WMC and auditory processing under low versus high visual load. Auditory processing was measured with auditory steady state responses (ASSR), and WMC was measured with an operation-letter span task. The results showed no significant correlation between WMC and ability to suppress task-irrelevant stimuli. Based on the data, it is not possible to conclude with certainty that effects of load on auditory processing are unaffected by WMC, because confidence intervals were large.
author Skarp, Rasmus
author_facet Skarp, Rasmus
author_sort Skarp, Rasmus
title Does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?
title_short Does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?
title_full Does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?
title_fullStr Does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?
title_full_unstemmed Does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?
title_sort does working memory capacity correlate with processing of auditory distractors under low versus high visual load?
publisher Stockholms universitet, Psykologiska institutionen
publishDate 2018
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157258
work_keys_str_mv AT skarprasmus doesworkingmemorycapacitycorrelatewithprocessingofauditorydistractorsunderlowversushighvisualload
_version_ 1718709424368910336