How important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?

The consequences of the agricultural intensification are many and include fragmentation of natural habitats, abandonment of small farms and traditional management, and increased inputs of pesticides and fertilizers. It has also lead to widespread declines in semi-natural grasslands and farmland biod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andersson, Kajsa
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för naturgeografi och kvartärgeologi (INK) 2010
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-46049
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-46049
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-460492013-01-08T13:27:52ZHow important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?engAndersson, KajsaStockholms universitet, Institutionen för naturgeografi och kvartärgeologi (INK)2010The consequences of the agricultural intensification are many and include fragmentation of natural habitats, abandonment of small farms and traditional management, and increased inputs of pesticides and fertilizers. It has also lead to widespread declines in semi-natural grasslands and farmland biodiversity. Small remnant habitats such as midfield islets and road verges can harbour many species and hence be important in biodiversity conservation. This study investigated how plant species richness and richness of grassland specialists differ in three agricultural landscapes: one open landscape with crop fields, one with a lot of forest and one landscape with a mix of forests and fields. Field studies included plant inventories in the small remnant habitats. Species-area relationships, accumulated species curves and Jaccard similarity index were used to analyze the data, where total species richness and grassland specialists were analysed separately. It was found that the two landscapes with the most forest had higher species richness in midfield islets, but not in road verges, and that the intermediate landscape had the strongest species-area relationship. Species accumulation curves show the fastest species accumulation rate for midfield islets in the forest landscape and for road verges in the open landscape. The remnant habitats in the forest and intermediate landscapes were most similar to the semi-natural grassland in that landscape. The connectivity of the landscape, as well as the presence of semi-natural grasslands may help to explain the results. This study shows that small remnant habitats could be important for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes and that managing the landscape in a way that preserves heterogeneity may be crucial for its continued species richness. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-46049application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The consequences of the agricultural intensification are many and include fragmentation of natural habitats, abandonment of small farms and traditional management, and increased inputs of pesticides and fertilizers. It has also lead to widespread declines in semi-natural grasslands and farmland biodiversity. Small remnant habitats such as midfield islets and road verges can harbour many species and hence be important in biodiversity conservation. This study investigated how plant species richness and richness of grassland specialists differ in three agricultural landscapes: one open landscape with crop fields, one with a lot of forest and one landscape with a mix of forests and fields. Field studies included plant inventories in the small remnant habitats. Species-area relationships, accumulated species curves and Jaccard similarity index were used to analyze the data, where total species richness and grassland specialists were analysed separately. It was found that the two landscapes with the most forest had higher species richness in midfield islets, but not in road verges, and that the intermediate landscape had the strongest species-area relationship. Species accumulation curves show the fastest species accumulation rate for midfield islets in the forest landscape and for road verges in the open landscape. The remnant habitats in the forest and intermediate landscapes were most similar to the semi-natural grassland in that landscape. The connectivity of the landscape, as well as the presence of semi-natural grasslands may help to explain the results. This study shows that small remnant habitats could be important for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes and that managing the landscape in a way that preserves heterogeneity may be crucial for its continued species richness.
author Andersson, Kajsa
spellingShingle Andersson, Kajsa
How important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?
author_facet Andersson, Kajsa
author_sort Andersson, Kajsa
title How important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?
title_short How important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?
title_full How important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?
title_fullStr How important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?
title_full_unstemmed How important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?
title_sort how important are small remnant habitats for biodiversity in the agricultural landscape?
publisher Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för naturgeografi och kvartärgeologi (INK)
publishDate 2010
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-46049
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonkajsa howimportantaresmallremnanthabitatsforbiodiversityintheagriculturallandscape
_version_ 1716521030591184896