Därför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet

The thesis aims at establishing what teachers of programme specific subjects state is the foundation for their assessment at the Hotel and Restaurant Programme (HR-programme). The theoretical framework of the thesis is based on social constructionism. The respondents were practising teachers of prog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tsagalidis, Helena
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:Swedish
Published: Stockholms universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-8191
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7155-738-4
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-8191
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-81912013-01-08T13:10:04ZDärför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmetsweThat’s why I only pass : Assessment of programme specific subjects in the HR-programmeTsagalidis, HelenaStockholms universitet, Pedagogiska institutionenStockholm : Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet2008types of knowledgetheoretical knowledgepractical masteryappropriate actionreflectionkey qualificationspecific vocational knowledge and skillslevels of expertiseEducationPedagogikThe thesis aims at establishing what teachers of programme specific subjects state is the foundation for their assessment at the Hotel and Restaurant Programme (HR-programme). The theoretical framework of the thesis is based on social constructionism. The respondents were practising teachers of programme specific subjects at HR-programme. The empirical data based on interviews and video interviews was analyzed with: types of knowledge, key qualifications, specific vocational knowledge and skill and levels of expertise. Seven key qualifications have been discerned: independence, planning skills, problem solving skills, co-operation, customer contact, communication and power of initiative. These can be divided in three dimensions: personal, cognitive, and social/interactive. For the student, the most important to focus on for getting a higher grade is independence. Five categories of programme specific subjects have been identified: understanding the vocational area, skills in working techniques and methods, hygiene and handling work tools, as well the ability to see the whole and to act simultaneously. Differences in qualifications between levels of expertise can be identified in skills, speed and comprehensive thinking which appear to be valued more by the respondents. Key qualifications include all types of knowledge, theoretical knowledge, practical mastery and appropriate action but also a keen mind for reflection over ones actions. Appropriate action in general is assessed on the level of overall focus, the highest level of expertise, and theoretical knowledge the lowest level of expertise. There’s concordance between respondents on assessment of knowledge and skills. Students have to have a great part of specific vocational knowledge and skills to achieve the degree of Pass. The respondents’ descriptions and appraisements of what is assessed reflect their vocational culture where experience has a master role which could be the main reason why an inexperienced student cannot achieve higher grade levels. Doctoral thesis, monographinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-8191urn:isbn:978-91-7155-738-4Doktorsavhandlingar från Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet, 1104-1625 ; 149application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic types of knowledge
theoretical knowledge
practical mastery
appropriate action
reflection
key qualification
specific vocational knowledge and skills
levels of expertise
Education
Pedagogik
spellingShingle types of knowledge
theoretical knowledge
practical mastery
appropriate action
reflection
key qualification
specific vocational knowledge and skills
levels of expertise
Education
Pedagogik
Tsagalidis, Helena
Därför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet
description The thesis aims at establishing what teachers of programme specific subjects state is the foundation for their assessment at the Hotel and Restaurant Programme (HR-programme). The theoretical framework of the thesis is based on social constructionism. The respondents were practising teachers of programme specific subjects at HR-programme. The empirical data based on interviews and video interviews was analyzed with: types of knowledge, key qualifications, specific vocational knowledge and skill and levels of expertise. Seven key qualifications have been discerned: independence, planning skills, problem solving skills, co-operation, customer contact, communication and power of initiative. These can be divided in three dimensions: personal, cognitive, and social/interactive. For the student, the most important to focus on for getting a higher grade is independence. Five categories of programme specific subjects have been identified: understanding the vocational area, skills in working techniques and methods, hygiene and handling work tools, as well the ability to see the whole and to act simultaneously. Differences in qualifications between levels of expertise can be identified in skills, speed and comprehensive thinking which appear to be valued more by the respondents. Key qualifications include all types of knowledge, theoretical knowledge, practical mastery and appropriate action but also a keen mind for reflection over ones actions. Appropriate action in general is assessed on the level of overall focus, the highest level of expertise, and theoretical knowledge the lowest level of expertise. There’s concordance between respondents on assessment of knowledge and skills. Students have to have a great part of specific vocational knowledge and skills to achieve the degree of Pass. The respondents’ descriptions and appraisements of what is assessed reflect their vocational culture where experience has a master role which could be the main reason why an inexperienced student cannot achieve higher grade levels.
author Tsagalidis, Helena
author_facet Tsagalidis, Helena
author_sort Tsagalidis, Helena
title Därför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet
title_short Därför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet
title_full Därför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet
title_fullStr Därför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet
title_full_unstemmed Därför fick jag bara Godkänt... : Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet
title_sort därför fick jag bara godkänt... : bedömning i karaktärsämnen på hr-programmet
publisher Stockholms universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen
publishDate 2008
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-8191
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7155-738-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tsagalidishelena darforfickjagbaragodkantbedomningikaraktarsamnenpahrprogrammet
AT tsagalidishelena thatswhyionlypassassessmentofprogrammespecificsubjectsinthehrprogramme
_version_ 1716510812599746560