Accounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and Acquisitions

In 2001, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standard Board) introduced accounting regulations SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of financial reporting. The new standards have profoundly changed the accounting for business combinations and go...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim, Christian, Mandal, Susmita
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Umeå universitet, Företagsekonomi 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-123559
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-123559
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-1235592016-08-20T05:06:10ZAccounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and AcquisitionsengKim, ChristianMandal, SusmitaUmeå universitet, FöretagsekonomiUmeå universitet, Företagsekonomi2016Goodwill allocationpurchase price allocationearnings managementpublic acquirerprivate acquirertarget characteristics.In 2001, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standard Board) introduced accounting regulations SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of financial reporting. The new standards have profoundly changed the accounting for business combinations and goodwill under US GAAP by requiring reporting entities to no longer amortize goodwill over its expected useful life, but to test for impairment annually. However, the new regulation has met sharp criticism for creating a scope for high levels of managerial discretion which may be exercised opportunistically in the accounting for goodwill. This study examines whether the proportion of purchase price allocated to goodwill differs between public and private acquisitions. We try to answer this question by carrying out a quantitative study on 481 observations, between the period of 2001 to 2005 by studying the relationship between acquirer type (Public vs. Private) and target firm characteristic on goodwill allocated, and we find the following results: 1) Public acquirers allocate higher levels of goodwill in comparison to private acquirers. (2) Market-to-book values of private target firms are not positively correlated with recorded goodwill levels. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-123559application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Goodwill allocation
purchase price allocation
earnings management
public acquirer
private acquirer
target characteristics.
spellingShingle Goodwill allocation
purchase price allocation
earnings management
public acquirer
private acquirer
target characteristics.
Kim, Christian
Mandal, Susmita
Accounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and Acquisitions
description In 2001, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standard Board) introduced accounting regulations SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of financial reporting. The new standards have profoundly changed the accounting for business combinations and goodwill under US GAAP by requiring reporting entities to no longer amortize goodwill over its expected useful life, but to test for impairment annually. However, the new regulation has met sharp criticism for creating a scope for high levels of managerial discretion which may be exercised opportunistically in the accounting for goodwill. This study examines whether the proportion of purchase price allocated to goodwill differs between public and private acquisitions. We try to answer this question by carrying out a quantitative study on 481 observations, between the period of 2001 to 2005 by studying the relationship between acquirer type (Public vs. Private) and target firm characteristic on goodwill allocated, and we find the following results: 1) Public acquirers allocate higher levels of goodwill in comparison to private acquirers. (2) Market-to-book values of private target firms are not positively correlated with recorded goodwill levels.
author Kim, Christian
Mandal, Susmita
author_facet Kim, Christian
Mandal, Susmita
author_sort Kim, Christian
title Accounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and Acquisitions
title_short Accounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and Acquisitions
title_full Accounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and Acquisitions
title_fullStr Accounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and Acquisitions
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for Goodwill in Public vs. Private Deals : Evidence from US Mergers and Acquisitions
title_sort accounting for goodwill in public vs. private deals : evidence from us mergers and acquisitions
publisher Umeå universitet, Företagsekonomi
publishDate 2016
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-123559
work_keys_str_mv AT kimchristian accountingforgoodwillinpublicvsprivatedealsevidencefromusmergersandacquisitions
AT mandalsusmita accountingforgoodwillinpublicvsprivatedealsevidencefromusmergersandacquisitions
_version_ 1718378931023773696