”Obligation”, ”Ought” and ”Can”
This paper criticises the famous “”ought” implies “can”” on the grounds that its main claim - that there can be no unfulfillable obligations - is false. The first part of the paper investigates the use, history and previous literature on the topic, as well as the proper understanding of the principl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Umeå universitet, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-179014 |