Semi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death Assays

Chemotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that uses drugs to kill the cancer cells. In order to evaluate the drug performance, we need cell death assays. Today, most cell death assays are based on fluorometric detection, which can cause phototoxic effects. To overcome the problem of phototoxicity,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Westman, Nelly
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Umeå universitet, Institutionen för fysik 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-185251
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-185251
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-1852512021-06-29T05:30:55ZSemi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death AssaysengSemi-Övervakad Inlärning för CelldödsanalyserWestman, NellyUmeå universitet, Institutionen för fysik2021Computer SciencesDatavetenskap (datalogi)Chemotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that uses drugs to kill the cancer cells. In order to evaluate the drug performance, we need cell death assays. Today, most cell death assays are based on fluorometric detection, which can cause phototoxic effects. To overcome the problem of phototoxicity, this thesis aims at examining new approaches that are not relying on fluorometric detection. Using deep learning for cell death classification from phase contrast images, we examine how well semi-supervised learning performs compared to supervised learning. Besides, we investigate if model generalization depends on the cell type: A549, AU565, and HeLa. Using SimCLR for self-supervised pre-training, we examine if our model can distinguish between dead and live cells (binary problem), and further whether the cells died from apoptosis or other cause (3-class problem). With supervised learning, our model achieves an accuracy of 76.1% and 53.6% on the binary and 3-class problem respectively. We demonstrate that the accuracy increases to 84.3% and 65.6% on respective problem using semi-supervised learning. The model generalizes most to HeLa and least to AU565, due to differences in cell type size. Nevertheless, semi-supervised learning can improve model generalization. Given that semi-supervised learning outperforms supervised learning, we conclude that there is a great potential of semi-supervised learning for cell death assays. However, we experience that the applied data augmentation in SimCLR is insufficient on phase contrast images. Future work should therefore focus on finding proper data augmentation. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-185251application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Computer Sciences
Datavetenskap (datalogi)
spellingShingle Computer Sciences
Datavetenskap (datalogi)
Westman, Nelly
Semi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death Assays
description Chemotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that uses drugs to kill the cancer cells. In order to evaluate the drug performance, we need cell death assays. Today, most cell death assays are based on fluorometric detection, which can cause phototoxic effects. To overcome the problem of phototoxicity, this thesis aims at examining new approaches that are not relying on fluorometric detection. Using deep learning for cell death classification from phase contrast images, we examine how well semi-supervised learning performs compared to supervised learning. Besides, we investigate if model generalization depends on the cell type: A549, AU565, and HeLa. Using SimCLR for self-supervised pre-training, we examine if our model can distinguish between dead and live cells (binary problem), and further whether the cells died from apoptosis or other cause (3-class problem). With supervised learning, our model achieves an accuracy of 76.1% and 53.6% on the binary and 3-class problem respectively. We demonstrate that the accuracy increases to 84.3% and 65.6% on respective problem using semi-supervised learning. The model generalizes most to HeLa and least to AU565, due to differences in cell type size. Nevertheless, semi-supervised learning can improve model generalization. Given that semi-supervised learning outperforms supervised learning, we conclude that there is a great potential of semi-supervised learning for cell death assays. However, we experience that the applied data augmentation in SimCLR is insufficient on phase contrast images. Future work should therefore focus on finding proper data augmentation.
author Westman, Nelly
author_facet Westman, Nelly
author_sort Westman, Nelly
title Semi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death Assays
title_short Semi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death Assays
title_full Semi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death Assays
title_fullStr Semi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death Assays
title_full_unstemmed Semi-Supervised Learning for Cell Death Assays
title_sort semi-supervised learning for cell death assays
publisher Umeå universitet, Institutionen för fysik
publishDate 2021
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-185251
work_keys_str_mv AT westmannelly semisupervisedlearningforcelldeathassays
AT westmannelly semiovervakadinlarningforcelldodsanalyser
_version_ 1719414676512571392