Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County

A questionnaire containing 69 curriculum areas for a vocational agricultural program in Utah County, Utah, and a proposed rating scale was mailed to 720 students who had graduated in vocational agriculture from eight high schools; to 14 agricultural teachers, and to 22 secondary school administrator...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phillips, Loren J.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 1970
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3799
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4809&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-4809
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-48092019-10-13T05:58:43Z Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County Phillips, Loren J. A questionnaire containing 69 curriculum areas for a vocational agricultural program in Utah County, Utah, and a proposed rating scale was mailed to 720 students who had graduated in vocational agriculture from eight high schools; to 14 agricultural teachers, and to 22 secondary school administrators and supervisors from Utah County; and to 28 other agricultural teachers selected at random in the state. Each person was asked to evaluate each curriculum area according to four suggested rating values: no value, has value, recommended, or essential. The rating from each respondent was tabulated for each curriculum area by total points by numerical rating sequence. All respondents approved all curriculum areas as having value, but they differed as to degree of acceptability. Four areas received a rating of (1-12) by all respondents. Forty-three areas received total point ratings between 13-56. Eleven curriculum areas were rated low (57-69) in acceptability by three or four groups of respondents. It is recommended that graduates from vocational agricultural programs, vocational agricultural teachers, administrators, and supervisors in secondary schools be involved in curriculum planning to correlate the agricultural program with interests of students and the needs of the communities and that data, such as revealed in this study, be considered in vocational agriculture curriculum planning. 1970-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3799 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4809&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU vocational agricultural curriculum study utah county agriculture Agricultural Education
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic vocational
agricultural
curriculum
study
utah
county
agriculture
Agricultural Education
spellingShingle vocational
agricultural
curriculum
study
utah
county
agriculture
Agricultural Education
Phillips, Loren J.
Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County
description A questionnaire containing 69 curriculum areas for a vocational agricultural program in Utah County, Utah, and a proposed rating scale was mailed to 720 students who had graduated in vocational agriculture from eight high schools; to 14 agricultural teachers, and to 22 secondary school administrators and supervisors from Utah County; and to 28 other agricultural teachers selected at random in the state. Each person was asked to evaluate each curriculum area according to four suggested rating values: no value, has value, recommended, or essential. The rating from each respondent was tabulated for each curriculum area by total points by numerical rating sequence. All respondents approved all curriculum areas as having value, but they differed as to degree of acceptability. Four areas received a rating of (1-12) by all respondents. Forty-three areas received total point ratings between 13-56. Eleven curriculum areas were rated low (57-69) in acceptability by three or four groups of respondents. It is recommended that graduates from vocational agricultural programs, vocational agricultural teachers, administrators, and supervisors in secondary schools be involved in curriculum planning to correlate the agricultural program with interests of students and the needs of the communities and that data, such as revealed in this study, be considered in vocational agriculture curriculum planning.
author Phillips, Loren J.
author_facet Phillips, Loren J.
author_sort Phillips, Loren J.
title Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County
title_short Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County
title_full Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County
title_fullStr Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County
title_full_unstemmed Vocational Agricultural Curriculum Study In Utah County
title_sort vocational agricultural curriculum study in utah county
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 1970
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3799
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4809&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipslorenj vocationalagriculturalcurriculumstudyinutahcounty
_version_ 1719267300739121152