Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters

Flow meters are used to measure flow accurately. There are many different flow meters and it is necessary to know which will function best for specific situations. A wide variety of flow meters were selected for the study to assist in showing that each flow meter has its tradeoffs. The selected mete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Prettyman, Johnny B.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3873
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4899&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-4899
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-48992019-10-13T05:31:01Z Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters Prettyman, Johnny B. Flow meters are used to measure flow accurately. There are many different flow meters and it is necessary to know which will function best for specific situations. A wide variety of flow meters were selected for the study to assist in showing that each flow meter has its tradeoffs. The selected meters include: three types of Venturi meters, a wedge meter, a V-cone meter, an electromagnetic flow meter, and an ultrasonic flow meter. The characteristics researched in this study are discharge coefficient (Cd) over a range of Reynolds numbers (Re), head loss across each flow meter, life, and cost of meter. Each meter was tested over a wide range of Re to find the corresponding Cd and head loss. The life and cost of each meter were researched and estimated based on the flow meter companies and local distributor’s findings. With the findings, the tradeoffs are illustrated and will assist buyers in selecting a flow meter that will best fit their needs. While there are more flow meters available than was tested, the current study can direct buyers in a correct process of selecting meters for all situations. 2014-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3873 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4899&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU Selected Differential Producing Ultrasonic Magnetic Flow Meters Civil and Environmental Engineering
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Selected Differential Producing
Ultrasonic
Magnetic Flow Meters
Civil and Environmental Engineering
spellingShingle Selected Differential Producing
Ultrasonic
Magnetic Flow Meters
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Prettyman, Johnny B.
Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters
description Flow meters are used to measure flow accurately. There are many different flow meters and it is necessary to know which will function best for specific situations. A wide variety of flow meters were selected for the study to assist in showing that each flow meter has its tradeoffs. The selected meters include: three types of Venturi meters, a wedge meter, a V-cone meter, an electromagnetic flow meter, and an ultrasonic flow meter. The characteristics researched in this study are discharge coefficient (Cd) over a range of Reynolds numbers (Re), head loss across each flow meter, life, and cost of meter. Each meter was tested over a wide range of Re to find the corresponding Cd and head loss. The life and cost of each meter were researched and estimated based on the flow meter companies and local distributor’s findings. With the findings, the tradeoffs are illustrated and will assist buyers in selecting a flow meter that will best fit their needs. While there are more flow meters available than was tested, the current study can direct buyers in a correct process of selecting meters for all situations.
author Prettyman, Johnny B.
author_facet Prettyman, Johnny B.
author_sort Prettyman, Johnny B.
title Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters
title_short Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters
title_full Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters
title_fullStr Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Selected Differential Producing, Ultrasonic, and Magnetic Flow Meters
title_sort comparison of selected differential producing, ultrasonic, and magnetic flow meters
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2014
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3873
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4899&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT prettymanjohnnyb comparisonofselecteddifferentialproducingultrasonicandmagneticflowmeters
_version_ 1719265450678812672