Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations

A series of five experiments was conducted to determine whether operant or respondent factors controlled the emission of a particular vocalization ( "Q" ) by human infants 16 to 18 months old. Experiment 1 consisted of a pilot investigation of the effects of an autoshaping procedure on thr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Myers, Alexander McNaughton
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 1981
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5899
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6948&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-6948
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-69482019-10-13T05:56:05Z Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations Myers, Alexander McNaughton A series of five experiments was conducted to determine whether operant or respondent factors controlled the emission of a particular vocalization ( "Q" ) by human infants 16 to 18 months old. Experiment 1 consisted of a pilot investigation of the effects of an autoshaping procedure on three infants' vocal behavior. All three subjects demonstrated increased emission of the target sound during the CR period. Experiments 2 through 4 attempted to replicate the findings of Experiment 1 under controlled conditions, and failed to do so. Experiment 5a presented infant subjects with a discrete-trial operant procedure (having the identical temporal parameters as the autoshaping procedure used in Experiments 1 through 4) , during which subjects received rewards only after emitting the target sound. All three experimentally naive subjects in this condition emitted the target sounds, and each met an acquisition criterion of 15 successive trials with at least one target response (CR) per trial. Subjects in Experiment 5b were exposed to the autoshaping procedure employed in Experiments 1 through 4; in addition, they were rewarded verbally for emitting the target sound at any time during the session. One of these three subjects increased her rate of target sound emission, but never met the acquisition criterion. The results suggest that vocalizations of subjects in this age range are susceptible to response-reinforcer (operant) manipulations and not to stimulus-stimulus (Pavlovian) associations. This conclusion differs from the findings of previous investigations that used younger infant subjects, suggesting that subject age may be important when conditioning vocalizations. Further research is also recommended to determine the utility of employing autoshaping procedures with humans. 1981-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5899 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6948&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU autoshaping infants vocalizations behavior Pavlov discrete-trial operant procedure Psychology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic autoshaping
infants
vocalizations
behavior
Pavlov
discrete-trial operant procedure
Psychology
spellingShingle autoshaping
infants
vocalizations
behavior
Pavlov
discrete-trial operant procedure
Psychology
Myers, Alexander McNaughton
Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations
description A series of five experiments was conducted to determine whether operant or respondent factors controlled the emission of a particular vocalization ( "Q" ) by human infants 16 to 18 months old. Experiment 1 consisted of a pilot investigation of the effects of an autoshaping procedure on three infants' vocal behavior. All three subjects demonstrated increased emission of the target sound during the CR period. Experiments 2 through 4 attempted to replicate the findings of Experiment 1 under controlled conditions, and failed to do so. Experiment 5a presented infant subjects with a discrete-trial operant procedure (having the identical temporal parameters as the autoshaping procedure used in Experiments 1 through 4) , during which subjects received rewards only after emitting the target sound. All three experimentally naive subjects in this condition emitted the target sounds, and each met an acquisition criterion of 15 successive trials with at least one target response (CR) per trial. Subjects in Experiment 5b were exposed to the autoshaping procedure employed in Experiments 1 through 4; in addition, they were rewarded verbally for emitting the target sound at any time during the session. One of these three subjects increased her rate of target sound emission, but never met the acquisition criterion. The results suggest that vocalizations of subjects in this age range are susceptible to response-reinforcer (operant) manipulations and not to stimulus-stimulus (Pavlovian) associations. This conclusion differs from the findings of previous investigations that used younger infant subjects, suggesting that subject age may be important when conditioning vocalizations. Further research is also recommended to determine the utility of employing autoshaping procedures with humans.
author Myers, Alexander McNaughton
author_facet Myers, Alexander McNaughton
author_sort Myers, Alexander McNaughton
title Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations
title_short Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations
title_full Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations
title_fullStr Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations
title_full_unstemmed Autoshaping Infant Vocalizations
title_sort autoshaping infant vocalizations
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 1981
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5899
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6948&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT myersalexandermcnaughton autoshapinginfantvocalizations
_version_ 1719267396800217088