An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the fall proportion of fawns among fawns and does in a mule deer population and two measures of productivity, the spring recruitment rate and the reproductive performance as measured in the fall. The spring recruitment rate was de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryel, Ronald J.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 1980
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6406
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7434&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-7434
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-74342019-10-13T06:10:57Z An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations Ryel, Ronald J. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the fall proportion of fawns among fawns and does in a mule deer population and two measures of productivity, the spring recruitment rate and the reproductive performance as measured in the fall. The spring recruitment rate was defined to be the number of fawns per doe which were recruited into the population at 1 year of age. The reproductive performance was defined to be the number of fawns produced per doe 2 years or older which survive to a specified time. The relationships between these quantities were measured by calculating linear coefficients of correlation from data generated by a projection matrix model of a mule deer population. A coefficient of correlation of 0.86 was found between the fall proportion of fawns and the rate at which fawns are recruited into the spring population. A coefficient of correlation of 0.89 was found between the fall proportion of fawns and the reproductive performance as measured in the fall. The effect of misclassifying fawns as does and does as fawns on estimates of the proportion of fawns among fawns and does was also investigated. A comparison was made between the expected values of two estimates of the fall proportion, one with misclassification and one without misclassification. The misclassification of fawns and does was found to bias estimates of the proportion of fawns. The bias was found to be a function of the amount of misclassification and the actual pro, portion of fawns. 1980-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6406 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7434&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU mule deer population productivity fawns does reproduction Animal Sciences Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Environmental Sciences
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic mule deer
population
productivity
fawns
does
reproduction
Animal Sciences
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Environmental Sciences
spellingShingle mule deer
population
productivity
fawns
does
reproduction
Animal Sciences
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Environmental Sciences
Ryel, Ronald J.
An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the fall proportion of fawns among fawns and does in a mule deer population and two measures of productivity, the spring recruitment rate and the reproductive performance as measured in the fall. The spring recruitment rate was defined to be the number of fawns per doe which were recruited into the population at 1 year of age. The reproductive performance was defined to be the number of fawns produced per doe 2 years or older which survive to a specified time. The relationships between these quantities were measured by calculating linear coefficients of correlation from data generated by a projection matrix model of a mule deer population. A coefficient of correlation of 0.86 was found between the fall proportion of fawns and the rate at which fawns are recruited into the spring population. A coefficient of correlation of 0.89 was found between the fall proportion of fawns and the reproductive performance as measured in the fall. The effect of misclassifying fawns as does and does as fawns on estimates of the proportion of fawns among fawns and does was also investigated. A comparison was made between the expected values of two estimates of the fall proportion, one with misclassification and one without misclassification. The misclassification of fawns and does was found to bias estimates of the proportion of fawns. The bias was found to be a function of the amount of misclassification and the actual pro, portion of fawns.
author Ryel, Ronald J.
author_facet Ryel, Ronald J.
author_sort Ryel, Ronald J.
title An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations
title_short An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations
title_full An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations
title_fullStr An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer Populations
title_sort analysis of a measure of productivity in mule deer populations
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 1980
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6406
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7434&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT ryelronaldj ananalysisofameasureofproductivityinmuledeerpopulations
AT ryelronaldj analysisofameasureofproductivityinmuledeerpopulations
_version_ 1719268186496434176