Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes

Involvement in collaborative partnerships in natural resource management has become a popular method for natural resource management agencies to collect public input, cope with conflicts, and develop ecosystem management plans. This thesis evaluates various collaborative processes, emphasizing multi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richardson, Kimberly J.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6577
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7634&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-7634
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-76342019-10-13T05:32:25Z Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes Richardson, Kimberly J. Involvement in collaborative partnerships in natural resource management has become a popular method for natural resource management agencies to collect public input, cope with conflicts, and develop ecosystem management plans. This thesis evaluates various collaborative processes, emphasizing multiple-owner partnerships. Qualitative interviews of 46 landowners in Utah were conducted to reveal concerns and suggestions regarding multiple-owner landscape-level collaborative partnerships. Landowners were concerned about private property rights infringement and losing control of their private land. Landowners were primarily concerned about the fairness and effectiveness of any partnership in which they were involved. However, they were willing to consider participating if certain procedural and group composition elements were met: realistic goals; compromise or consensus-based decision-making; time efficiency; participant commitment, especially by public land management officials; more weight given to local concerns than non-local concerns; participant knowledge of local ecosystems; and respect among participants. A follow-up study with participants of eight collaborative partnerships in four western states examined the importance of the procedural and group composition elements identified from the landowner interviews, plus one from a literature review, i.e., that participants feel that they have some control and/or a voice in the process. Analysis revealed that all but one of these elements - more weight given to local concerns - were associated with participants' perceptions that their partnership was fair and effective. These elements can be used as guidelines for emerging collaborative partnerships. Participants were overwhelmingly positive in their evaluations of their partnerships, suggesting that there are real benefits of using collaborative processes. 1998-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6577 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7634&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU perceived fairness effectiveness rangeland collaborative processes Agriculture Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Environmental Sciences Plant Sciences
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic perceived fairness
effectiveness
rangeland
collaborative processes
Agriculture
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Environmental Sciences
Plant Sciences
spellingShingle perceived fairness
effectiveness
rangeland
collaborative processes
Agriculture
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Environmental Sciences
Plant Sciences
Richardson, Kimberly J.
Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes
description Involvement in collaborative partnerships in natural resource management has become a popular method for natural resource management agencies to collect public input, cope with conflicts, and develop ecosystem management plans. This thesis evaluates various collaborative processes, emphasizing multiple-owner partnerships. Qualitative interviews of 46 landowners in Utah were conducted to reveal concerns and suggestions regarding multiple-owner landscape-level collaborative partnerships. Landowners were concerned about private property rights infringement and losing control of their private land. Landowners were primarily concerned about the fairness and effectiveness of any partnership in which they were involved. However, they were willing to consider participating if certain procedural and group composition elements were met: realistic goals; compromise or consensus-based decision-making; time efficiency; participant commitment, especially by public land management officials; more weight given to local concerns than non-local concerns; participant knowledge of local ecosystems; and respect among participants. A follow-up study with participants of eight collaborative partnerships in four western states examined the importance of the procedural and group composition elements identified from the landowner interviews, plus one from a literature review, i.e., that participants feel that they have some control and/or a voice in the process. Analysis revealed that all but one of these elements - more weight given to local concerns - were associated with participants' perceptions that their partnership was fair and effective. These elements can be used as guidelines for emerging collaborative partnerships. Participants were overwhelmingly positive in their evaluations of their partnerships, suggesting that there are real benefits of using collaborative processes.
author Richardson, Kimberly J.
author_facet Richardson, Kimberly J.
author_sort Richardson, Kimberly J.
title Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes
title_short Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes
title_full Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes
title_fullStr Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes
title_full_unstemmed Perceived Fairness and Effectiveness of Rangeland Collaborative Processes
title_sort perceived fairness and effectiveness of rangeland collaborative processes
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 1998
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6577
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7634&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonkimberlyj perceivedfairnessandeffectivenessofrangelandcollaborativeprocesses
_version_ 1719266164205420544