Modernism and the classical tradition

This dissertation seeks to abolish the inherited cliché that the Modernist writers and artists rejected earlier art and literature, particularly that of the classical tradition. In fact, both literature and art of the early 20th century made widespread use of the inherited Greco-Roman tradition in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wood, Dafydd Gwilym
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2193
id ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2010-12-2193
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2010-12-21932015-09-20T17:13:09ZModernism and the classical traditionWood, Dafydd GwilymModernismClassical traditionClassical reception studiesEuropean studiesModernityModern poetryAvant garde20th centuryThis dissertation seeks to abolish the inherited cliché that the Modernist writers and artists rejected earlier art and literature, particularly that of the classical tradition. In fact, both literature and art of the early 20th century made widespread use of the inherited Greco-Roman tradition in a myriad of ways. Moreover, beginning after the First World War and maturing in the 1920s, a demonstrative Neoclassical “movement” appeared across different types of art and different nations. A neoclassical or classicizing style or form is inherently malleable, an empty signifier that can, through an artist or writer’s emphasis, point towards any number of meanings. This allowed a classical style to become widespread along with its seeming resiliency as the ordered, traditional bedrock of the West. In the 1930s, however, the fascist parties of Germany, France, and Italy began to appropriate the neoclassical as a state- or party-style because of the ease with which politics could be incorporated into a relatively vacant form. Their systematic use of the classical tradition in large part “tainted” classical subjects and styles, which allowed for the post-World War II institutionalization of the avant garde. I argue that texts which used the classical tradition could do so in four distinct manners—four types of classicism. Symbolic Classicism controls its classical material by using it only at the level of hollow icon which pregnantly gestures towards antiquity. Traditional Classicism, like an adaptation of a classical narrative particularly in drama, becomes completely dependent on its borrowings. Formal Classicism borrows an inherited, vacant form which can then be injected with Modernity. Finally, Synthetic Classicism necessitates a careful balancing of the classical material, not reducing it to symbolic meaning, but producing a novel narrative or mirroring-effect, that controls its various elements designed into a modern theme or objective.text2013-01-29T20:30:58Z2013-01-29T20:30:58Z2010-122013-01-29December 20102013-01-29T20:31:07Zthesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-21932152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2193eng
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Modernism
Classical tradition
Classical reception studies
European studies
Modernity
Modern poetry
Avant garde
20th century
spellingShingle Modernism
Classical tradition
Classical reception studies
European studies
Modernity
Modern poetry
Avant garde
20th century
Wood, Dafydd Gwilym
Modernism and the classical tradition
description This dissertation seeks to abolish the inherited cliché that the Modernist writers and artists rejected earlier art and literature, particularly that of the classical tradition. In fact, both literature and art of the early 20th century made widespread use of the inherited Greco-Roman tradition in a myriad of ways. Moreover, beginning after the First World War and maturing in the 1920s, a demonstrative Neoclassical “movement” appeared across different types of art and different nations. A neoclassical or classicizing style or form is inherently malleable, an empty signifier that can, through an artist or writer’s emphasis, point towards any number of meanings. This allowed a classical style to become widespread along with its seeming resiliency as the ordered, traditional bedrock of the West. In the 1930s, however, the fascist parties of Germany, France, and Italy began to appropriate the neoclassical as a state- or party-style because of the ease with which politics could be incorporated into a relatively vacant form. Their systematic use of the classical tradition in large part “tainted” classical subjects and styles, which allowed for the post-World War II institutionalization of the avant garde. I argue that texts which used the classical tradition could do so in four distinct manners—four types of classicism. Symbolic Classicism controls its classical material by using it only at the level of hollow icon which pregnantly gestures towards antiquity. Traditional Classicism, like an adaptation of a classical narrative particularly in drama, becomes completely dependent on its borrowings. Formal Classicism borrows an inherited, vacant form which can then be injected with Modernity. Finally, Synthetic Classicism necessitates a careful balancing of the classical material, not reducing it to symbolic meaning, but producing a novel narrative or mirroring-effect, that controls its various elements designed into a modern theme or objective. === text
author Wood, Dafydd Gwilym
author_facet Wood, Dafydd Gwilym
author_sort Wood, Dafydd Gwilym
title Modernism and the classical tradition
title_short Modernism and the classical tradition
title_full Modernism and the classical tradition
title_fullStr Modernism and the classical tradition
title_full_unstemmed Modernism and the classical tradition
title_sort modernism and the classical tradition
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2193
work_keys_str_mv AT wooddafyddgwilym modernismandtheclassicaltradition
_version_ 1716823347764920320