| Summary: | The paper investigates how Information Systems (IS) has emerged as the product of interdisciplinary
discourses. The research aim in this study is to better understand diversity in IS research,
and the extent to which the diversity of discourse expanded and contracted from 1995 to 2011.
Methodologically, we apply a combined citations/co-citations analysis based on the eight Association
for Information Systems (AIS) basket journals and the 22 subject-field classification framework
provided by the Association of Business Schools (ABS). Our findings suggest that IS is in a state of
continuous interaction and competition with other disciplines. General Management was reduced from
a dominant position as a reference discipline in IS at the expense of a growing variety of other
discourses including Business Strategy, Marketing, and Ethics and Governance among others. Over
time, IS as a field moved from the periphery to a central position during its discursive formation. This
supports the notion of IS as a fluid discipline dynamically embracing a diverse range of adjacent
reference disciplines, whilst keeping a degree of continuing interaction with them. Understanding
where IS is currently at allows us to better understand and propose fruitful avenues for its development
in both academia and practice.
|
|---|
