An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia

Declines in pollinators around the globe, notably the loss of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) to Colony Collapse Disorder, coupled with a dearth of quantitative data on non-Apis bee pollinators, led to this dissertation research, which documents the role of non-Apis bees in crop pollination in southw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adamson, Nancy Lee
Other Authors: Entomology
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26313
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02252011-134549/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-26313
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-263132020-09-26T05:30:32Z An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia Adamson, Nancy Lee Entomology Roulston, T'ai H. Pfeiffer, Douglas G. Kennedy, Lisa M. Mullins, Donald E. Fell, Richard D. pollinators native bees ecosystem services southwest Virginia agriculture non-Apis bee crop pollination pollination Declines in pollinators around the globe, notably the loss of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) to Colony Collapse Disorder, coupled with a dearth of quantitative data on non-Apis bee pollinators, led to this dissertation research, which documents the role of non-Apis bees in crop pollination in southwest Virginia. Major findings of this first study of its kind in the region were that non-Apis bees provided the majority of pollination—measured by visitation—for several economically important entomophilous crops (apple, blueberry, caneberry, and cucurbits); diverse bee populations may be helping to stabilize pollination service (105 species on crop flowers); landscape factors were better predictors of non-Apis crop pollination service than farm management factors or overall bee diversity; and non-Apis bees in the genera Andrena, Bombus, and Osmia were as constant as honey bees when foraging on apple. Non-Apis, primarily native, bees made up between 68% (in caneberries) and 83% (in cucurbits) of bees observed visiting crop flowers. While 37–59 species visited crop flowers, there was low correspondence between bee communities across or within crop systems ("within crop" Jaccard similarity indices for richness ranged from 0.12–0.28). Bee community diversity on crop flowers may help stabilize pollination service if one or more species declines temporally or spatially. A few species were especially important in each crop: Andrena barbara in apple; Andrena carlini and A. vicina in blueberry; Lasioglossum leucozonium in caneberry; and Peponapis pruinosa and Bombus impatiens in cucurbits. Eight species collected were Virginia state records. In models testing effects of farm management and landscape on non-Apis crop pollination service, percent deciduous forest was positively correlated in apple, blueberry, and squash, but at different scales. For apple and blueberry, pollination service declined with an increase in utilized alternative forage but was positively related to habitat heterogeneity. For squash, percent native plants also related positively, possibly due to increased presence of bumble bees in late summer. Species collected from both bowl traps and flowers was as low as 22% and overall site bee diversity had no effect on crop pollination service, highlighting the value in pollination research of monitoring bees on flowers. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T20:07:48Z 2014-03-14T20:07:48Z 2011-02-03 2011-02-25 2011-03-22 2011-03-22 Dissertation etd-02252011-134549 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26313 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02252011-134549/ Adamson_NL_D_2011.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic pollinators
native bees
ecosystem services
southwest Virginia agriculture
non-Apis bee crop pollination
pollination
spellingShingle pollinators
native bees
ecosystem services
southwest Virginia agriculture
non-Apis bee crop pollination
pollination
Adamson, Nancy Lee
An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia
description Declines in pollinators around the globe, notably the loss of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) to Colony Collapse Disorder, coupled with a dearth of quantitative data on non-Apis bee pollinators, led to this dissertation research, which documents the role of non-Apis bees in crop pollination in southwest Virginia. Major findings of this first study of its kind in the region were that non-Apis bees provided the majority of pollination—measured by visitation—for several economically important entomophilous crops (apple, blueberry, caneberry, and cucurbits); diverse bee populations may be helping to stabilize pollination service (105 species on crop flowers); landscape factors were better predictors of non-Apis crop pollination service than farm management factors or overall bee diversity; and non-Apis bees in the genera Andrena, Bombus, and Osmia were as constant as honey bees when foraging on apple. Non-Apis, primarily native, bees made up between 68% (in caneberries) and 83% (in cucurbits) of bees observed visiting crop flowers. While 37–59 species visited crop flowers, there was low correspondence between bee communities across or within crop systems ("within crop" Jaccard similarity indices for richness ranged from 0.12–0.28). Bee community diversity on crop flowers may help stabilize pollination service if one or more species declines temporally or spatially. A few species were especially important in each crop: Andrena barbara in apple; Andrena carlini and A. vicina in blueberry; Lasioglossum leucozonium in caneberry; and Peponapis pruinosa and Bombus impatiens in cucurbits. Eight species collected were Virginia state records. In models testing effects of farm management and landscape on non-Apis crop pollination service, percent deciduous forest was positively correlated in apple, blueberry, and squash, but at different scales. For apple and blueberry, pollination service declined with an increase in utilized alternative forage but was positively related to habitat heterogeneity. For squash, percent native plants also related positively, possibly due to increased presence of bumble bees in late summer. Species collected from both bowl traps and flowers was as low as 22% and overall site bee diversity had no effect on crop pollination service, highlighting the value in pollination research of monitoring bees on flowers. === Ph. D.
author2 Entomology
author_facet Entomology
Adamson, Nancy Lee
author Adamson, Nancy Lee
author_sort Adamson, Nancy Lee
title An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia
title_short An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia
title_full An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia
title_fullStr An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Non-Apis Bees as Fruit and Vegetable Crop Pollinators in Southwest Virginia
title_sort assessment of non-apis bees as fruit and vegetable crop pollinators in southwest virginia
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26313
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02252011-134549/
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsonnancylee anassessmentofnonapisbeesasfruitandvegetablecroppollinatorsinsouthwestvirginia
AT adamsonnancylee assessmentofnonapisbeesasfruitandvegetablecroppollinatorsinsouthwestvirginia
_version_ 1719340534632284160