Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts

The use of systems that span many knowledge domains is becoming more common as technology advances, requiring expert-performance in a domain from users who are usually not experts in that domain. This study examined a means of communicating expertise (in system operation and fault diagnosis) to non...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Staderman, William P.
Other Authors: Industrial and Systems Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27468
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05012003-130105/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-27468
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-274682020-09-26T05:34:07Z Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts Staderman, William P. Industrial and Systems Engineering Kleiner, Brian M. Smith-Jackson, Tonya L. Williges, Robert C. North, Christopher L. Hudlicka, Eva mental models device models augmented reality The use of systems that span many knowledge domains is becoming more common as technology advances, requiring expert-performance in a domain from users who are usually not experts in that domain. This study examined a means of communicating expertise (in system operation and fault diagnosis) to non-experts and furthering the understanding of expert mental models. It has been suggested that conceptions of abstract models of system-functions distinguish expert performance from non-expert performance (Hanisch, Kramer, and Hulin, 1991). This study examined the effects on performance of augmenting a simple control panel device with a model of the functions of the device, interacting with the model, and augmenting the device with graphically superimposed procedural indicators (directions). The five augmented display conditions studied were: Device Only, Device + Model, Device + Procedural Indicators, Interactive Model, and Interactive Model + Procedural Indicators. The device and displays were presented on a PC workstation. Performance measures (speed and accuracy) and subjective measures (questionnaires, NASA TLX, and structured interviews) were collected. It was expected that participants who interact with the device + procedural indicators would exhibit the shortest performance time and least errors; however, those who interacted with the simplest display (device only) were fastest and exhibited the least errors. Results of this study are discussed in terms of building a mental model and identifying situations that require a mental model. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T20:11:20Z 2014-03-14T20:11:20Z 2003-04-25 2003-05-01 2004-05-01 2003-05-01 Dissertation etd-05012003-130105 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27468 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05012003-130105/ staderman_etd.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic mental models
device models
augmented reality
spellingShingle mental models
device models
augmented reality
Staderman, William P.
Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts
description The use of systems that span many knowledge domains is becoming more common as technology advances, requiring expert-performance in a domain from users who are usually not experts in that domain. This study examined a means of communicating expertise (in system operation and fault diagnosis) to non-experts and furthering the understanding of expert mental models. It has been suggested that conceptions of abstract models of system-functions distinguish expert performance from non-expert performance (Hanisch, Kramer, and Hulin, 1991). This study examined the effects on performance of augmenting a simple control panel device with a model of the functions of the device, interacting with the model, and augmenting the device with graphically superimposed procedural indicators (directions). The five augmented display conditions studied were: Device Only, Device + Model, Device + Procedural Indicators, Interactive Model, and Interactive Model + Procedural Indicators. The device and displays were presented on a PC workstation. Performance measures (speed and accuracy) and subjective measures (questionnaires, NASA TLX, and structured interviews) were collected. It was expected that participants who interact with the device + procedural indicators would exhibit the shortest performance time and least errors; however, those who interacted with the simplest display (device only) were fastest and exhibited the least errors. Results of this study are discussed in terms of building a mental model and identifying situations that require a mental model. === Ph. D.
author2 Industrial and Systems Engineering
author_facet Industrial and Systems Engineering
Staderman, William P.
author Staderman, William P.
author_sort Staderman, William P.
title Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts
title_short Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts
title_full Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts
title_fullStr Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts
title_full_unstemmed Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts
title_sort communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27468
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05012003-130105/
work_keys_str_mv AT stadermanwilliamp communicatingexpertiseinsystemoperationandfaultdiagnosistononexperts
_version_ 1719341486811643904