The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process

A considerable body of knowledge has been accumulated regarding the effects of participation, but little research has dealt with the effects of participation in the development of a measurement system. This research tests the effect of participation on the development of a workshop evaluation proces...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raderstorf, M. Kim
Other Authors: Industrial and Systems Engineering
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46169
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12052009-020407/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-46169
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-461692021-05-26T05:48:22Z The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process Raderstorf, M. Kim Industrial and Systems Engineering LD5655.V855 1995.R334 A considerable body of knowledge has been accumulated regarding the effects of participation, but little research has dealt with the effects of participation in the development of a measurement system. This research tests the effect of participation on the development of a workshop evaluation process by identifying trust as a key variable and quantifying the effect of participation on trust. (In this research, a workshop evaluation process is considered to be a type or example of a measurement system.) The researcher believed to the extent participation in the development of a workshop evaluation process contributed to the amount of information a participant had regarding the system and to a feeling of commitment and control on the part of the participant, positive effects of participation would generalize to others areas and lead to an increase in trust. During the study, fourteen workshop leaders were divided into a control and treatment group. The treatment group participated in an one-hour session to develop the workshop evaluation form; the control group did not. All participants were surveyed on trust after the workshop evaluation form was used to evaluate each presentation. No significant differences in trust of the workshop evaluation process, other workshop leaders, or the people who managed the workshop evaluation process were found between the control and treatment group participants. The attenuation of the data was attributed to the small sample size, short length of participation, and questions regarding the validity of the trust instrument. Master of Science 2014-03-14T21:51:17Z 2014-03-14T21:51:17Z 1995 2009-12-05 2009-12-05 2009-12-05 Thesis Text etd-12052009-020407 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46169 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12052009-020407/ en OCLC# 34371491 LD5655.V855_1995.R334.pdf vi,72 leaves BTD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1995.R334
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1995.R334
Raderstorf, M. Kim
The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process
description A considerable body of knowledge has been accumulated regarding the effects of participation, but little research has dealt with the effects of participation in the development of a measurement system. This research tests the effect of participation on the development of a workshop evaluation process by identifying trust as a key variable and quantifying the effect of participation on trust. (In this research, a workshop evaluation process is considered to be a type or example of a measurement system.) The researcher believed to the extent participation in the development of a workshop evaluation process contributed to the amount of information a participant had regarding the system and to a feeling of commitment and control on the part of the participant, positive effects of participation would generalize to others areas and lead to an increase in trust. During the study, fourteen workshop leaders were divided into a control and treatment group. The treatment group participated in an one-hour session to develop the workshop evaluation form; the control group did not. All participants were surveyed on trust after the workshop evaluation form was used to evaluate each presentation. No significant differences in trust of the workshop evaluation process, other workshop leaders, or the people who managed the workshop evaluation process were found between the control and treatment group participants. The attenuation of the data was attributed to the small sample size, short length of participation, and questions regarding the validity of the trust instrument. === Master of Science
author2 Industrial and Systems Engineering
author_facet Industrial and Systems Engineering
Raderstorf, M. Kim
author Raderstorf, M. Kim
author_sort Raderstorf, M. Kim
title The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process
title_short The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process
title_full The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process
title_fullStr The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process
title_full_unstemmed The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process
title_sort effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation process
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46169
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12052009-020407/
work_keys_str_mv AT raderstorfmkim theeffectofparticipationontrustinthedevelopmentofaworkshopevaluationprocess
AT raderstorfmkim effectofparticipationontrustinthedevelopmentofaworkshopevaluationprocess
_version_ 1719406745318588416