Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
Static pressure and mean velocity data were obtained in a relaxing shear driven three-dimensional incompressible turbulent boundary layer flow produced by a swept rectangular step. The nominally 10 cm (4 in.) thick boundary layer had a freestream velocity of approximately 25 m/sec (80 ft/sec). The t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71095 |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-71095 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-710952020-09-29T05:47:18Z Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer Nelson, Douglas J. Mechanical Engineering LD5655.V855 1979.N458 Turbulent boundary layer Static pressure and mean velocity data were obtained in a relaxing shear driven three-dimensional incompressible turbulent boundary layer flow produced by a swept rectangular step. The nominally 10 cm (4 in.) thick boundary layer had a freestream velocity of approximately 25 m/sec (80 ft/sec). The two steps investigated were each 3.8 cm (1.5 in.) high by 18.4 cm (7 .25 irt.) long and at angles of 30° and 45° to the transverse wind tunnel direction. Pressure gradients were determined by taking the derivative of least-squares curve fits to the static pressure data. Close to the trailing edge reattachment region, the maximum·gradient was·0.8 kPa/m (5 psf/f) for the 30° step and 0.4 kPa/m (2.5 psf/f) for the 45°step. As expected, a region of nominal pressure gradient (0.03 kPa/m or 0.2 psf/f compared to 1.6 kPa/m or 10 psf/f for a pressure driven flow) was found at greater than 36 cm (14 in.) down.stream of the trailing edge of each step. The wall crossflow angle decayed from 67° at 15 cm (6 in.) behind the trailing edge to 9° at 66 cm (26 in.) for the 30° step. In the same region, the crossflow angle decayed from 45° to 6° for the 45° step. The decay or relaxation was found to be much faster in the near-wall region and in the region close to the trailing edge. A defect in the streamwise velocity profiles indicated that the flow was dominated by the separation and reattachment over the step. For future shear driven investigations, a lower, more streamlined wing-type body is recommended to produce a moderately skewed boundary layer without dominant separation effects. Master of Science 2016-05-23T14:57:55Z 2016-05-23T14:57:55Z 1979 Thesis Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71095 en_US OCLC# 5630085 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ xi, 171, [2] leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
LD5655.V855 1979.N458 Turbulent boundary layer |
spellingShingle |
LD5655.V855 1979.N458 Turbulent boundary layer Nelson, Douglas J. Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer |
description |
Static pressure and mean velocity data were obtained in a relaxing shear driven three-dimensional incompressible turbulent boundary layer flow produced by a swept rectangular step. The nominally 10 cm (4 in.) thick boundary layer had a freestream velocity of approximately 25 m/sec (80 ft/sec). The two steps investigated were each 3.8 cm (1.5 in.) high by 18.4 cm (7 .25 irt.) long and at angles of 30° and 45° to the transverse wind tunnel direction.
Pressure gradients were determined by taking the derivative of least-squares curve fits to the static pressure data. Close to the trailing edge reattachment region, the maximum·gradient was·0.8 kPa/m (5 psf/f) for the 30° step and 0.4 kPa/m (2.5 psf/f) for the 45°step. As expected, a region of nominal pressure gradient (0.03 kPa/m or 0.2 psf/f compared to 1.6 kPa/m or 10 psf/f for a pressure driven flow) was found at greater than 36 cm (14 in.) down.stream of the trailing edge of each step.
The wall crossflow angle decayed from 67° at 15 cm (6 in.) behind the trailing edge to 9° at 66 cm (26 in.) for the 30° step. In the same region, the crossflow angle decayed from 45° to 6° for the 45° step. The decay or relaxation was found to be much faster in the near-wall region and in the region close to the trailing edge.
A defect in the streamwise velocity profiles indicated that the flow was dominated by the separation and reattachment over the step. For future shear driven investigations, a lower, more streamlined wing-type body is recommended to produce a moderately skewed boundary layer without dominant separation effects. === Master of Science |
author2 |
Mechanical Engineering |
author_facet |
Mechanical Engineering Nelson, Douglas J. |
author |
Nelson, Douglas J. |
author_sort |
Nelson, Douglas J. |
title |
Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer |
title_short |
Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer |
title_full |
Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer |
title_fullStr |
Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer |
title_sort |
pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer |
publisher |
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71095 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nelsondouglasj pressureandvelocityfieldsinarelaxingthreedimensionalturbulentboundarylayer |
_version_ |
1719346629894471680 |