Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer

Static pressure and mean velocity data were obtained in a relaxing shear driven three-dimensional incompressible turbulent boundary layer flow produced by a swept rectangular step. The nominally 10 cm (4 in.) thick boundary layer had a freestream velocity of approximately 25 m/sec (80 ft/sec). The t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nelson, Douglas J.
Other Authors: Mechanical Engineering
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71095
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-71095
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-710952020-09-29T05:47:18Z Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer Nelson, Douglas J. Mechanical Engineering LD5655.V855 1979.N458 Turbulent boundary layer Static pressure and mean velocity data were obtained in a relaxing shear driven three-dimensional incompressible turbulent boundary layer flow produced by a swept rectangular step. The nominally 10 cm (4 in.) thick boundary layer had a freestream velocity of approximately 25 m/sec (80 ft/sec). The two steps investigated were each 3.8 cm (1.5 in.) high by 18.4 cm (7 .25 irt.) long and at angles of 30° and 45° to the transverse wind tunnel direction. Pressure gradients were determined by taking the derivative of least-squares curve fits to the static pressure data. Close to the trailing edge reattachment region, the maximum·gradient was·0.8 kPa/m (5 psf/f) for the 30° step and 0.4 kPa/m (2.5 psf/f) for the 45°step. As expected, a region of nominal pressure gradient (0.03 kPa/m or 0.2 psf/f compared to 1.6 kPa/m or 10 psf/f for a pressure driven flow) was found at greater than 36 cm (14 in.) down.stream of the trailing edge of each step. The wall crossflow angle decayed from 67° at 15 cm (6 in.) behind the trailing edge to 9° at 66 cm (26 in.) for the 30° step. In the same region, the crossflow angle decayed from 45° to 6° for the 45° step. The decay or relaxation was found to be much faster in the near-wall region and in the region close to the trailing edge. A defect in the streamwise velocity profiles indicated that the flow was dominated by the separation and reattachment over the step. For future shear driven investigations, a lower, more streamlined wing-type body is recommended to produce a moderately skewed boundary layer without dominant separation effects. Master of Science 2016-05-23T14:57:55Z 2016-05-23T14:57:55Z 1979 Thesis Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71095 en_US OCLC# 5630085 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ xi, 171, [2] leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1979.N458
Turbulent boundary layer
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1979.N458
Turbulent boundary layer
Nelson, Douglas J.
Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
description Static pressure and mean velocity data were obtained in a relaxing shear driven three-dimensional incompressible turbulent boundary layer flow produced by a swept rectangular step. The nominally 10 cm (4 in.) thick boundary layer had a freestream velocity of approximately 25 m/sec (80 ft/sec). The two steps investigated were each 3.8 cm (1.5 in.) high by 18.4 cm (7 .25 irt.) long and at angles of 30° and 45° to the transverse wind tunnel direction. Pressure gradients were determined by taking the derivative of least-squares curve fits to the static pressure data. Close to the trailing edge reattachment region, the maximum·gradient was·0.8 kPa/m (5 psf/f) for the 30° step and 0.4 kPa/m (2.5 psf/f) for the 45°step. As expected, a region of nominal pressure gradient (0.03 kPa/m or 0.2 psf/f compared to 1.6 kPa/m or 10 psf/f for a pressure driven flow) was found at greater than 36 cm (14 in.) down.stream of the trailing edge of each step. The wall crossflow angle decayed from 67° at 15 cm (6 in.) behind the trailing edge to 9° at 66 cm (26 in.) for the 30° step. In the same region, the crossflow angle decayed from 45° to 6° for the 45° step. The decay or relaxation was found to be much faster in the near-wall region and in the region close to the trailing edge. A defect in the streamwise velocity profiles indicated that the flow was dominated by the separation and reattachment over the step. For future shear driven investigations, a lower, more streamlined wing-type body is recommended to produce a moderately skewed boundary layer without dominant separation effects. === Master of Science
author2 Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Mechanical Engineering
Nelson, Douglas J.
author Nelson, Douglas J.
author_sort Nelson, Douglas J.
title Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
title_short Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
title_full Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
title_fullStr Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
title_full_unstemmed Pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
title_sort pressure and velocity fields in a relaxing three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71095
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsondouglasj pressureandvelocityfieldsinarelaxingthreedimensionalturbulentboundarylayer
_version_ 1719346629894471680