DIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPING

Right parietal lesions often lead to neglect, in which patients fail to attend to leftward stimuli. Recent models of neglect suggest that, in addition to attentional impairments, patients demonstrate impairments of spatial remapping and/or spatial working memory (SWM). Although spatial remapping cou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vasquez, Brandon Paul
Language:en
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10012/3290
id ndltd-WATERLOO-oai-uwspace.uwaterloo.ca-10012-3290
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-WATERLOO-oai-uwspace.uwaterloo.ca-10012-32902013-01-08T18:50:31ZVasquez, Brandon Paul2007-09-24T19:03:56Z2007-09-24T19:03:56Z2007-09-24T19:03:56Z2007http://hdl.handle.net/10012/3290Right parietal lesions often lead to neglect, in which patients fail to attend to leftward stimuli. Recent models of neglect suggest that, in addition to attentional impairments, patients demonstrate impairments of spatial remapping and/or spatial working memory (SWM). Although spatial remapping could be considered a kind of spatial memory process itself (i.e., updating remembered locations based on anticipated saccade outcomes), the two processes operate on very different time scales (milliseconds versus seconds). In the present study, the influence of saccadic and spatial remapping on SWM was examined in healthy individuals. An initial control condition, in which participants had to respond to a probe stimulus (i.e., “is the probe in the location previously occupied by the target?”) following a 1500 ms delay, was contrasted with conditions in which the fixation point moved (left, right, up, or down) at the onset of the delay. In a second version of the task, participants made covert shifts of attention at delay onset requiring covert spatial, rather than saccadic, remapping. In both tasks SWM performance was best when no remapping was required. Decrements in SWM were largest overall in the spatial remapping task, whereas for both saccadic and spatial remapping, a consistent cost was observed for remapping the target array into right visual space. Results are discussed in terms of hemispheric biases in attention and differences in performance for peripersonal versus extrapersonal space.enneglectspatial remappingsaccadic remappingspatial working memoryDIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPINGThesis or DissertationPsychologyMaster of ArtsPsychology (Behavioural Neuroscience)
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic neglect
spatial remapping
saccadic remapping
spatial working memory
Psychology (Behavioural Neuroscience)
spellingShingle neglect
spatial remapping
saccadic remapping
spatial working memory
Psychology (Behavioural Neuroscience)
Vasquez, Brandon Paul
DIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPING
description Right parietal lesions often lead to neglect, in which patients fail to attend to leftward stimuli. Recent models of neglect suggest that, in addition to attentional impairments, patients demonstrate impairments of spatial remapping and/or spatial working memory (SWM). Although spatial remapping could be considered a kind of spatial memory process itself (i.e., updating remembered locations based on anticipated saccade outcomes), the two processes operate on very different time scales (milliseconds versus seconds). In the present study, the influence of saccadic and spatial remapping on SWM was examined in healthy individuals. An initial control condition, in which participants had to respond to a probe stimulus (i.e., “is the probe in the location previously occupied by the target?”) following a 1500 ms delay, was contrasted with conditions in which the fixation point moved (left, right, up, or down) at the onset of the delay. In a second version of the task, participants made covert shifts of attention at delay onset requiring covert spatial, rather than saccadic, remapping. In both tasks SWM performance was best when no remapping was required. Decrements in SWM were largest overall in the spatial remapping task, whereas for both saccadic and spatial remapping, a consistent cost was observed for remapping the target array into right visual space. Results are discussed in terms of hemispheric biases in attention and differences in performance for peripersonal versus extrapersonal space.
author Vasquez, Brandon Paul
author_facet Vasquez, Brandon Paul
author_sort Vasquez, Brandon Paul
title DIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPING
title_short DIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPING
title_full DIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPING
title_fullStr DIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPING
title_full_unstemmed DIRECTION SPECIFIC COSTS TO SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY FROM SACCADIC AND SPATIAL REMAPPING
title_sort direction specific costs to spatial working memory from saccadic and spatial remapping
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/10012/3290
work_keys_str_mv AT vasquezbrandonpaul directionspecificcoststospatialworkingmemoryfromsaccadicandspatialremapping
_version_ 1716572995944710144