Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.
This dissertation explores the impact of the state public sector legal environment as a determinant of the governance content of faculty collective bargaining agreements. Using content analysis, the legal environment and contractual content are reduced to quantities that may be explored through the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
1990
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185108 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-185108 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1851082015-10-23T04:30:49Z Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. Wilson, Marie Elaine. Sacken, Michael Conrad, Clifton Grant, Robert Heglang, Kenney Silverman, Andy Collective labor agreements -- College teachers -- United States -- States Collective labor agreements -- Government employees -- United States -- States State universities and colleges -- United States -- Faculty State universities and colleges -- United States -- Administration. This dissertation explores the impact of the state public sector legal environment as a determinant of the governance content of faculty collective bargaining agreements. Using content analysis, the legal environment and contractual content are reduced to quantities that may be explored through the lens of population ecology. Legal environment is determined to have a significant impact on the development of contractual content and individual factors of governance and statutory form are identified. Specifically, the statutory scope language and reservation of management rights are seen as the primary environmental forces determining policy and rule issues in contractual content. Further, the relevant temporal element for an ecological model appears to be the tenure of public sector bargaining in each state. National affiliation, institutional type and other temporal variables do not have a significant impact on governance language. Implications and directions for further research are discussed. 1990 text Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185108 704590246 9032533 en Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Collective labor agreements -- College teachers -- United States -- States Collective labor agreements -- Government employees -- United States -- States State universities and colleges -- United States -- Faculty State universities and colleges -- United States -- Administration. |
spellingShingle |
Collective labor agreements -- College teachers -- United States -- States Collective labor agreements -- Government employees -- United States -- States State universities and colleges -- United States -- Faculty State universities and colleges -- United States -- Administration. Wilson, Marie Elaine. Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. |
description |
This dissertation explores the impact of the state public sector legal environment as a determinant of the governance content of faculty collective bargaining agreements. Using content analysis, the legal environment and contractual content are reduced to quantities that may be explored through the lens of population ecology. Legal environment is determined to have a significant impact on the development of contractual content and individual factors of governance and statutory form are identified. Specifically, the statutory scope language and reservation of management rights are seen as the primary environmental forces determining policy and rule issues in contractual content. Further, the relevant temporal element for an ecological model appears to be the tenure of public sector bargaining in each state. National affiliation, institutional type and other temporal variables do not have a significant impact on governance language. Implications and directions for further research are discussed. |
author2 |
Sacken, Michael |
author_facet |
Sacken, Michael Wilson, Marie Elaine. |
author |
Wilson, Marie Elaine. |
author_sort |
Wilson, Marie Elaine. |
title |
Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. |
title_short |
Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. |
title_full |
Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. |
title_fullStr |
Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. |
title_sort |
collective bargaining in higher education: a model of statutory constraint. |
publisher |
The University of Arizona. |
publishDate |
1990 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185108 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wilsonmarieelaine collectivebargaininginhighereducationamodelofstatutoryconstraint |
_version_ |
1718097549367181312 |