Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.

This dissertation explores the impact of the state public sector legal environment as a determinant of the governance content of faculty collective bargaining agreements. Using content analysis, the legal environment and contractual content are reduced to quantities that may be explored through the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wilson, Marie Elaine.
Other Authors: Sacken, Michael
Language:en
Published: The University of Arizona. 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185108
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-185108
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1851082015-10-23T04:30:49Z Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint. Wilson, Marie Elaine. Sacken, Michael Conrad, Clifton Grant, Robert Heglang, Kenney Silverman, Andy Collective labor agreements -- College teachers -- United States -- States Collective labor agreements -- Government employees -- United States -- States State universities and colleges -- United States -- Faculty State universities and colleges -- United States -- Administration. This dissertation explores the impact of the state public sector legal environment as a determinant of the governance content of faculty collective bargaining agreements. Using content analysis, the legal environment and contractual content are reduced to quantities that may be explored through the lens of population ecology. Legal environment is determined to have a significant impact on the development of contractual content and individual factors of governance and statutory form are identified. Specifically, the statutory scope language and reservation of management rights are seen as the primary environmental forces determining policy and rule issues in contractual content. Further, the relevant temporal element for an ecological model appears to be the tenure of public sector bargaining in each state. National affiliation, institutional type and other temporal variables do not have a significant impact on governance language. Implications and directions for further research are discussed. 1990 text Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185108 704590246 9032533 en Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Collective labor agreements -- College teachers -- United States -- States
Collective labor agreements -- Government employees -- United States -- States
State universities and colleges -- United States -- Faculty
State universities and colleges -- United States -- Administration.
spellingShingle Collective labor agreements -- College teachers -- United States -- States
Collective labor agreements -- Government employees -- United States -- States
State universities and colleges -- United States -- Faculty
State universities and colleges -- United States -- Administration.
Wilson, Marie Elaine.
Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.
description This dissertation explores the impact of the state public sector legal environment as a determinant of the governance content of faculty collective bargaining agreements. Using content analysis, the legal environment and contractual content are reduced to quantities that may be explored through the lens of population ecology. Legal environment is determined to have a significant impact on the development of contractual content and individual factors of governance and statutory form are identified. Specifically, the statutory scope language and reservation of management rights are seen as the primary environmental forces determining policy and rule issues in contractual content. Further, the relevant temporal element for an ecological model appears to be the tenure of public sector bargaining in each state. National affiliation, institutional type and other temporal variables do not have a significant impact on governance language. Implications and directions for further research are discussed.
author2 Sacken, Michael
author_facet Sacken, Michael
Wilson, Marie Elaine.
author Wilson, Marie Elaine.
author_sort Wilson, Marie Elaine.
title Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.
title_short Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.
title_full Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.
title_fullStr Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.
title_full_unstemmed Collective bargaining in higher education: A model of statutory constraint.
title_sort collective bargaining in higher education: a model of statutory constraint.
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 1990
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185108
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonmarieelaine collectivebargaininginhighereducationamodelofstatutoryconstraint
_version_ 1718097549367181312