Quantifying Power and Bias in Cluster Randomized Trials Using Mixed Models vs. Cluster-Level Analysis in the Presence of Missing Data: A Simulation Study
In cluster randomized trials (CRTs), groups are randomized to treatment arms rather than individuals while the outcome is assessed on the individuals within each cluster. Individuals within clusters tend to be more similar than in a randomly selected sample, which poses issues with dependence, which...
Main Author: | Vincent, Brenda |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Bell, Melanie |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/613376 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/613376 |
Similar Items
-
Statistical Approaches for Handling Missing Data in Cluster Randomized Trials
by: Fiero, Mallorie H.
Published: (2016) -
The mixed model for repeated measures for cluster randomized trials: a simulation study investigating bias and type I error with missing continuous data
by: Melanie L. Bell, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial
by: Rochelle Yang, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Handling missing data in cluster randomized trials: A demonstration of multiple imputation with PAN through SAS
by: Jiangxiu Zhou, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01) -
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
by: Jennifer F. Bobb, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)