Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN

We present a recalibration of the M-BH-sigma(star) relation, based on a sample of 16 reverberation-mapped galaxies with newly determined bulge stellar velocity dispersions (sigma(star)) from integral-field spectroscopy (IFS), and a sample of 32 quiescent galaxies with publicly available IFS. For bot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Batiste, Merida, Bentz, Misty C., Raimundo, Sandra I., Vestergaard, Marianne, Onken, Christopher A.
Other Authors: Univ Arizona, Steward Observ
Language:en
Published: IOP PUBLISHING LTD 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623860
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/623860
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-623860
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6238602017-06-04T03:00:36Z Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN Batiste, Merida Bentz, Misty C. Raimundo, Sandra I. Vestergaard, Marianne Onken, Christopher A. Univ Arizona, Steward Observ galaxies: active galaxies: bulges galaxies: kinematics and dynamics We present a recalibration of the M-BH-sigma(star) relation, based on a sample of 16 reverberation-mapped galaxies with newly determined bulge stellar velocity dispersions (sigma(star)) from integral-field spectroscopy (IFS), and a sample of 32 quiescent galaxies with publicly available IFS. For both samples, sigma(star) is determined via two different methods that are popular in the literature, and we provide fits for each sample based on both sets of sigma(star). We find the fit to the active galactic nucleus sample is shallower than the fit to the quiescent galaxy sample, and that the slopes for each sample are in agreement with previous investigations. However, the intercepts to the quiescent galaxy relations are notably higher than those found in previous studies, due to the systematically lower sigma(star) measurements that we obtain from IFS. We find that this may be driven, in part, by poorly constrained measurements of bulge effective radius (r(e)) for the quiescent galaxy sample, which may bias the sigma(star) measurements low. We use these quiescent galaxy parameterizations, as well as one from the literature, to recalculate the virial scaling factor f. We assess the potential biases in each measurement, and suggest f = 4.82 +/- 1.67 as the best currently available estimate. However, we caution that the details of how sigma(star) is measured can significantly affect f, and there is still much room for improvement. 2017-03-24 Article Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN 2017, 838 (1):L10 The Astrophysical Journal 2041-8213 10.3847/2041-8213/aa6571 http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623860 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/623860 The Astrophysical Journal Letters en http://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/838/i=1/a=L10?key=crossref.6e3e8a73fe9962a2637f2b7c82206091 © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. IOP PUBLISHING LTD
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic galaxies: active
galaxies: bulges
galaxies: kinematics and dynamics
spellingShingle galaxies: active
galaxies: bulges
galaxies: kinematics and dynamics
Batiste, Merida
Bentz, Misty C.
Raimundo, Sandra I.
Vestergaard, Marianne
Onken, Christopher A.
Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN
description We present a recalibration of the M-BH-sigma(star) relation, based on a sample of 16 reverberation-mapped galaxies with newly determined bulge stellar velocity dispersions (sigma(star)) from integral-field spectroscopy (IFS), and a sample of 32 quiescent galaxies with publicly available IFS. For both samples, sigma(star) is determined via two different methods that are popular in the literature, and we provide fits for each sample based on both sets of sigma(star). We find the fit to the active galactic nucleus sample is shallower than the fit to the quiescent galaxy sample, and that the slopes for each sample are in agreement with previous investigations. However, the intercepts to the quiescent galaxy relations are notably higher than those found in previous studies, due to the systematically lower sigma(star) measurements that we obtain from IFS. We find that this may be driven, in part, by poorly constrained measurements of bulge effective radius (r(e)) for the quiescent galaxy sample, which may bias the sigma(star) measurements low. We use these quiescent galaxy parameterizations, as well as one from the literature, to recalculate the virial scaling factor f. We assess the potential biases in each measurement, and suggest f = 4.82 +/- 1.67 as the best currently available estimate. However, we caution that the details of how sigma(star) is measured can significantly affect f, and there is still much room for improvement.
author2 Univ Arizona, Steward Observ
author_facet Univ Arizona, Steward Observ
Batiste, Merida
Bentz, Misty C.
Raimundo, Sandra I.
Vestergaard, Marianne
Onken, Christopher A.
author Batiste, Merida
Bentz, Misty C.
Raimundo, Sandra I.
Vestergaard, Marianne
Onken, Christopher A.
author_sort Batiste, Merida
title Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN
title_short Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN
title_full Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN
title_fullStr Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN
title_full_unstemmed Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN
title_sort recalibration of the mbh–σ⋆ relation for agn
publisher IOP PUBLISHING LTD
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623860
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/623860
work_keys_str_mv AT batistemerida recalibrationofthembhsrelationforagn
AT bentzmistyc recalibrationofthembhsrelationforagn
AT raimundosandrai recalibrationofthembhsrelationforagn
AT vestergaardmarianne recalibrationofthembhsrelationforagn
AT onkenchristophera recalibrationofthembhsrelationforagn
_version_ 1718455905618493440