A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods

abstract: The Volume-of-Fluid method is a popular method for interface tracking in Multiphase applications within Computational Fluid Dynamics. To date there exists several algorithms for reconstruction of a geometric interface surface. Of these are the Finite Difference algorithm, Least Squares Vol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Kedelty, Dominic Sebastian (Author)
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.29784
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-29784
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-297842018-06-22T03:06:05Z A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods abstract: The Volume-of-Fluid method is a popular method for interface tracking in Multiphase applications within Computational Fluid Dynamics. To date there exists several algorithms for reconstruction of a geometric interface surface. Of these are the Finite Difference algorithm, Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, LVIRA, and the Efficient Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, ELVIRA. Along with these geometric interface reconstruction algorithms, there exist several volume-of-fluid transportation algorithms. This paper will discuss two operator-splitting advection algorithms and an unsplit advection algorithm. Using these three interface reconstruction algorithms, and three advection algorithms, a comparison will be drawn to see how different combinations of these algorithms perform with respect to accuracy as well as computational expense. Dissertation/Thesis Kedelty, Dominic Sebastian (Author) Herrmann, Marcus (Advisor) Huang, Huei-Ping (Committee member) Chen, Kangping (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Mechanical engineering computational fluid dynamics fluid mechanics interface capturing interface tracking multiphase Volume-of-Fluid eng 88 pages Masters Thesis Mechanical Engineering 2015 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.29784 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2015
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Mechanical engineering
computational fluid dynamics
fluid mechanics
interface capturing
interface tracking
multiphase
Volume-of-Fluid
spellingShingle Mechanical engineering
computational fluid dynamics
fluid mechanics
interface capturing
interface tracking
multiphase
Volume-of-Fluid
A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods
description abstract: The Volume-of-Fluid method is a popular method for interface tracking in Multiphase applications within Computational Fluid Dynamics. To date there exists several algorithms for reconstruction of a geometric interface surface. Of these are the Finite Difference algorithm, Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, LVIRA, and the Efficient Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, ELVIRA. Along with these geometric interface reconstruction algorithms, there exist several volume-of-fluid transportation algorithms. This paper will discuss two operator-splitting advection algorithms and an unsplit advection algorithm. Using these three interface reconstruction algorithms, and three advection algorithms, a comparison will be drawn to see how different combinations of these algorithms perform with respect to accuracy as well as computational expense. === Dissertation/Thesis === Masters Thesis Mechanical Engineering 2015
author2 Kedelty, Dominic Sebastian (Author)
author_facet Kedelty, Dominic Sebastian (Author)
title A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods
title_short A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods
title_full A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods
title_fullStr A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods
title_sort comparison of performance between reconstruction and advection algorithms for volume-of-fluid methods
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.29784
_version_ 1718700723310428160