A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods
abstract: The Volume-of-Fluid method is a popular method for interface tracking in Multiphase applications within Computational Fluid Dynamics. To date there exists several algorithms for reconstruction of a geometric interface surface. Of these are the Finite Difference algorithm, Least Squares Vol...
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertation |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.29784 |
id |
ndltd-asu.edu-item-29784 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-asu.edu-item-297842018-06-22T03:06:05Z A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods abstract: The Volume-of-Fluid method is a popular method for interface tracking in Multiphase applications within Computational Fluid Dynamics. To date there exists several algorithms for reconstruction of a geometric interface surface. Of these are the Finite Difference algorithm, Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, LVIRA, and the Efficient Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, ELVIRA. Along with these geometric interface reconstruction algorithms, there exist several volume-of-fluid transportation algorithms. This paper will discuss two operator-splitting advection algorithms and an unsplit advection algorithm. Using these three interface reconstruction algorithms, and three advection algorithms, a comparison will be drawn to see how different combinations of these algorithms perform with respect to accuracy as well as computational expense. Dissertation/Thesis Kedelty, Dominic Sebastian (Author) Herrmann, Marcus (Advisor) Huang, Huei-Ping (Committee member) Chen, Kangping (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Mechanical engineering computational fluid dynamics fluid mechanics interface capturing interface tracking multiphase Volume-of-Fluid eng 88 pages Masters Thesis Mechanical Engineering 2015 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.29784 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2015 |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Dissertation |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Mechanical engineering computational fluid dynamics fluid mechanics interface capturing interface tracking multiphase Volume-of-Fluid |
spellingShingle |
Mechanical engineering computational fluid dynamics fluid mechanics interface capturing interface tracking multiphase Volume-of-Fluid A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods |
description |
abstract: The Volume-of-Fluid method is a popular method for interface tracking in Multiphase applications within Computational Fluid Dynamics. To date there exists several algorithms for reconstruction of a geometric interface surface. Of these are the Finite Difference algorithm, Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, LVIRA, and the Efficient Least Squares Volume-of-Fluid Interface Reconstruction Algorithm, ELVIRA. Along with these geometric interface reconstruction algorithms, there exist several volume-of-fluid transportation algorithms. This paper will discuss two operator-splitting advection algorithms and an unsplit advection algorithm. Using these three interface reconstruction algorithms, and three advection algorithms, a comparison will be drawn to see how different combinations of these algorithms perform with respect to accuracy as well as computational expense. === Dissertation/Thesis === Masters Thesis Mechanical Engineering 2015 |
author2 |
Kedelty, Dominic Sebastian (Author) |
author_facet |
Kedelty, Dominic Sebastian (Author) |
title |
A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods |
title_short |
A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods |
title_full |
A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Performance between Reconstruction and Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods |
title_sort |
comparison of performance between reconstruction and advection algorithms for volume-of-fluid methods |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.29784 |
_version_ |
1718700723310428160 |