You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence

abstract: This experiment uses the Community of Knowledge framework to better understand how jurors interpret new information (Sloman & Rabb, 2016). Participants learned of an ostensibly new scientific finding that was claimed to either be well-understood or not understood by experts. Despite in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Jones, Ashley C. T. (Author)
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.50550
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-50550
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-505502018-10-02T03:01:11Z You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence abstract: This experiment uses the Community of Knowledge framework to better understand how jurors interpret new information (Sloman & Rabb, 2016). Participants learned of an ostensibly new scientific finding that was claimed to either be well-understood or not understood by experts. Despite including no additional information, expert understanding led participants to believe that they personally understood the phenomenon, with expert understanding acting as a cue for trustworthiness and believability. This effect was particularly pronounced with low-quality sources. These results are discussed in the context of how information is used by jurors in court, and the implications of the “Community of Knowledge” effect being used by expert witnesses. Dissertation/Thesis Jones, Ashley C. T. (Author) Schweitzer, Nicholas J. (Advisor) Neal, Tess M.S. (Committee member) Salerno, Jessica M. (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Psychology Social psychology Law community of knowledge decision making elaboration likelihood expert testimony fact finder eng 50 pages Masters Thesis Psychology 2018 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.50550 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ 2018
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
Social psychology
Law
community of knowledge
decision making
elaboration likelihood
expert testimony
fact finder
spellingShingle Psychology
Social psychology
Law
community of knowledge
decision making
elaboration likelihood
expert testimony
fact finder
You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence
description abstract: This experiment uses the Community of Knowledge framework to better understand how jurors interpret new information (Sloman & Rabb, 2016). Participants learned of an ostensibly new scientific finding that was claimed to either be well-understood or not understood by experts. Despite including no additional information, expert understanding led participants to believe that they personally understood the phenomenon, with expert understanding acting as a cue for trustworthiness and believability. This effect was particularly pronounced with low-quality sources. These results are discussed in the context of how information is used by jurors in court, and the implications of the “Community of Knowledge” effect being used by expert witnesses. === Dissertation/Thesis === Masters Thesis Psychology 2018
author2 Jones, Ashley C. T. (Author)
author_facet Jones, Ashley C. T. (Author)
title You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence
title_short You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence
title_full You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence
title_fullStr You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence
title_full_unstemmed You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence
title_sort you understand, so i understand: how a "community of knowledge" shapes trust in expert evidence
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.50550
_version_ 1718757030384107520