You Understand, So I Understand: How A "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust in Expert Evidence
abstract: This experiment uses the Community of Knowledge framework to better understand how jurors interpret new information (Sloman & Rabb, 2016). Participants learned of an ostensibly new scientific finding that was claimed to either be well-understood or not understood by experts. Despite in...
Other Authors: | Jones, Ashley C. T. (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertation |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.50550 |
Similar Items
-
Legal and Scientific Implications of Daubert: An Empirical Analysis of Expert Psychological Testimony
by: Bern, Zachary
Published: (2018) -
How Psychology’s Empirical Results Can Benefit the Criminal Justice System: Expert Testimony
by: McCurry, Ford C
Published: (2013) -
Robust Trust in Expert Testimony
by: Christian Dahlman, et al.
Published: (2015-05-01) -
Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges
by: William Douglas Woody, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Debiasing the Courtroom: Using Behavioral Insights to Avoid and Mitigate Cognitive Biases
by: Yokum, David Vincent
Published: (2014)