Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011

abstract: Advocacy groups work across many aspects of “death with dignity” practice and treatment, and provide insight across multiple aspects of “death with dignity”. This study argues that key advocacy groups in the American death with dignity movement influenced the broader conceptualization of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Cohan, Hailey E (Author)
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.53720
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-53720
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-537202019-05-16T03:01:40Z Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011 abstract: Advocacy groups work across many aspects of “death with dignity” practice and treatment, and provide insight across multiple aspects of “death with dignity”. This study argues that key advocacy groups in the American death with dignity movement influenced the broader conceptualization of death with dignity in a way that makes patients more able to achieve it. This influence has been a dynamic process across different periods of practice starting the discussion of “death with dignity” in 1985 through today, although this thesis extends only to 2011. The question in this study is how do the three main historical advocacy groups in the US: the Hemlock Society, Compassion in Dying, and Compassion and Choices, conceptualize death with dignity with regards to patient and doctor relationship, legal and policy factors, and medical technologies and protocols? This study found that the Hemlock Society (1980-2005) characterized death with dignity as a terminally ill patient being able to “self-deliver” from suffering via autoeuthanasia regardless of medical community approval or legality. Compassion in Dying (1993-2007) characterized death with dignity as involved advocacy work with terminal patients and their communities to pursue palliative care and hospice up to the point of assisted death. This organization was also involved in the passing of Oregon Death with Dignity Act. Compassion and Choices (2007-present) characterized death with dignity similarly to Compassion in Dying but also advocated for adequate management of pain and suffering symptoms in palliative care to prevent people from desiring death over the illness. Conceptualizing death with dignity is important for understanding why patients want death with dignity and better accommodating their end of life needs when they are suffering with terminal illness. Dissertation/Thesis Cohan, Hailey E (Author) Ellison, Karin (Advisor) O'Neil, Erica (Committee member) Piemonte, Nicole (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Biology Ethics Medical ethics Aided Dying Bioethics Death with Dignity Medical Advocacy Medical Ethics Policy eng 89 pages Masters Thesis Biology 2019 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.53720 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ 2019
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Biology
Ethics
Medical ethics
Aided Dying
Bioethics
Death with Dignity
Medical Advocacy
Medical Ethics
Policy
spellingShingle Biology
Ethics
Medical ethics
Aided Dying
Bioethics
Death with Dignity
Medical Advocacy
Medical Ethics
Policy
Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011
description abstract: Advocacy groups work across many aspects of “death with dignity” practice and treatment, and provide insight across multiple aspects of “death with dignity”. This study argues that key advocacy groups in the American death with dignity movement influenced the broader conceptualization of death with dignity in a way that makes patients more able to achieve it. This influence has been a dynamic process across different periods of practice starting the discussion of “death with dignity” in 1985 through today, although this thesis extends only to 2011. The question in this study is how do the three main historical advocacy groups in the US: the Hemlock Society, Compassion in Dying, and Compassion and Choices, conceptualize death with dignity with regards to patient and doctor relationship, legal and policy factors, and medical technologies and protocols? This study found that the Hemlock Society (1980-2005) characterized death with dignity as a terminally ill patient being able to “self-deliver” from suffering via autoeuthanasia regardless of medical community approval or legality. Compassion in Dying (1993-2007) characterized death with dignity as involved advocacy work with terminal patients and their communities to pursue palliative care and hospice up to the point of assisted death. This organization was also involved in the passing of Oregon Death with Dignity Act. Compassion and Choices (2007-present) characterized death with dignity similarly to Compassion in Dying but also advocated for adequate management of pain and suffering symptoms in palliative care to prevent people from desiring death over the illness. Conceptualizing death with dignity is important for understanding why patients want death with dignity and better accommodating their end of life needs when they are suffering with terminal illness. === Dissertation/Thesis === Masters Thesis Biology 2019
author2 Cohan, Hailey E (Author)
author_facet Cohan, Hailey E (Author)
title Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011
title_short Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011
title_full Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011
title_fullStr Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011
title_full_unstemmed Advocating Dignity: Death with dignity in the US, 1985-2011
title_sort advocating dignity: death with dignity in the us, 1985-2011
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.53720
_version_ 1719184111981035520